SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2017
Subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.
Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07250685 (Subthalamic Nucleus Versus Globus Pallidal Internus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Subthalamic Nucleus Versus Globus Pallidal Internus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvement of Deep Brain Stimulation in Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation for tremor suppression in Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Risk of Cerebrovascular Events in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease Focused on STN and GPi: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Probabilistic mapping of the antiparkinsonian effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus and subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, retrospective study of efficacy and safety.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Surgical Advances in Parkinson's Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Critical test of the assumption that the hypothalamic entopeduncular nucleus of rodents is homologous with the primate internal pallidum.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023Article
- Quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease: a comparison between preoperative and postoperative states among those who were treated with deep brain stimulation.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) has two anatomical targets: the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPI). The clinical effectiveness of these two stimulation targets was compared in the present study. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluated the postoperative changes in the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) on- and off-phase, on-stimulation motor scores; activities of daily living score (ADLS); and levodopa equivalent dose (LED) after STN and GPI stimulation. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of PD treated by STN and GPI stimulation were considered for inclusion. Results Eight published reports of eligible studies involving 599 patients met the inclusion criteria. No significant differences were observed between the STN and GPI groups in the on-medication, on-stimulation UPDRS motor score [mean difference, 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.96-5.27] or ADLS (mean difference, 3.40; 95% CI, 0.95-7.76). Significant differences in favor of STN stimulation were noted in the off-medication, on-stimulation UPDRS motor score (mean difference, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.98-2.37) and LED (mean difference, 130.24; 95% CI, 28.82-231.65). Conclusion The STN may be the preferred target for DBS in consideration of medication reduction, economic efficiency, and motor function improvement in the off phase. However, treatment decisions should be made according to the individual patient's symptoms and expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.