Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700910›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Catch Bonds at T Cell Interfaces: Impact of Surface Reorganization and Membrane Fluctuations.

Robert H Pullen, Steven M Abel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Catch bond kinetics are instrumental to cohesion of fire ant rafts under load.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Propulsive cell entry diverts pathogens from immune degradation by remodeling the phagocytic synapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A mutagenesis study of autoantigen optimization for potential T1D vaccine design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert H PullenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Steven M AbelDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. Electronic address: abel@utk.edu.
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catch bonds are characterized by average lifetimes that initially increase with increasing tensile force. Recently, they have been implicated in T cell activation, where small numbers of antigenic receptor-ligand bonds at a cell-cell interface can stimulate a T cell. Here, we use computational methods to investigate small numbers of bonds at the interface between two membranes. We characterize the time-dependent forces on the bonds in response to changes in the membrane shape and the organization of other surface molecules. We then determine the distributions of bond lifetimes using recent force-dependent lifetime data for T cell receptors bound to various ligands. Strong agonists, which exhibit catch bond behavior, are markedly more likely to remain intact than an antagonist whose average lifetime decreases with increasing force. Thermal fluctuations of the membrane shape enhance the decay of the average force on a bond, but also lead to fluctuations of the force. These fluctuations promote bond rupture, but the effect is buffered by catch bonds. When more than one bond is present, the bonds experience reduced average forces that depend on their relative positions, leading to changes in bond lifetimes. Our results highlight the importance of force-dependent binding kinetics when bonds experience time-dependent and fluctuating forces, as well as potential consequences of collective bond behavior relevant to T cell activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCell MembraneComputer SimulationKineticsLymphocyte ActivationModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSurface PropertiesTemperatureT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID28700910
PMCPMC5510709
OpenAlexW2735069743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.