Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700784›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2017

Association of Clinical Factors With a Major Pathologic Response Following Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Jordan M Cloyd, Huamin Wang, Michael E Egger, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Laura R Prakash, Anirban Maitra, Gauri R Varadhachary, Rachna Shroff, Milind Javle, David Fogelman and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient experience and quality of life during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and study protocol.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Nanoparticles Bounded to Interfering RNAs as a Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Proteomics in pancreatic cancer.Biomarker research · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jordan M CloydDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Huamin WangDepartment of Pathology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael E EggerDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Laura R PrakashDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Anirban MaitraDepartment of Pathology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Gauri R VaradhacharyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Rachna ShroffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
David FogelmanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Robert A WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Radiation Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael P KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jean-Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Thomas A AloiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jason B FlemingDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jeffrey E LeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceWe previously demonstrated that a major pathologic response to preoperative therapy, defined histopathologically by the presence of less than 5% viable cancer cells in the surgical specimen, is an important prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, to our knowledge, the patients most likely to experience a significant response to therapy are undefined.

objectiveTo identify clinical factors associated with major pathologic response in a large cohort of patients who underwent preoperative therapy and pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The study included 583 patients with histopathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received preoperative therapy prior to pancreatectomy between 1990 and 2015. EXPOSURES: Preoperative therapy consisted of systemic chemotherapy alone (n = 38; 6.5%), chemoradiation alone (n = 261; 44.8%), or both (n = 284; 48.7%) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 514; 88.2%), distal pancreatectomy (n = 62; 10.6%), or total pancreatectomy (n = 7; 1.2%). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical variables associated with a major pathologic response (pathologic complete response or <5% residual cancer cells) were evaluated using logistic regression.

resultsAmong all patients, the mean (SD) age was 63.7 (9.2) years, and 53.0% were men. A major pathologic response was seen in 77 patients (13.2%) including 23 (3.9%) who had a complete pathologic response. The median overall survival duration was significantly longer for patients who had a major response than for those who did not (73.4 months vs 32.2 months, P < .001). On multivariate logistic regression, only age younger than 50 years, baseline serum cancer antigen 19-9 level less than 200 U/mL, and gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer were associated with a major response. The number of these positive factors was associated with the likelihood of a major response in a stepwise fashion (0, 7.5%; 1, 12.7%; 2, 16.9%; 3, 35.7%; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although a major pathologic response occurs infrequently following preoperative therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, it is associated with a significantly improved prognosis. Of the patient- and treatment-related factors we analyzed, only young age, low baseline cancer antigen 19-9, and gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer were associated with a major pathologic response. Given its association with long-term survival, better predictors of response and more effective preoperative regimens should be aggressively sought.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAge FactorsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPancreatic NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDeoxycytidineGemcitabineRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID28700784
PMCPMC5710421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.