Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700742›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Direct medical cost associated with diabetic retinopathy severity in type 2 diabetes in Singapore.

Xiao Zhang, Serena Low, Neelam Kumari, Jiexun Wang, Keven Ang, Darren Yeo, Chee Chew Yip, Subramaniam Tavintharan, Chee Fang Sum, Su Chi Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fenofibrate for diabetic retinopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao ZhangClinical Research Unit, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Serena LowClinical Research Unit, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Neelam KumariDepartment of ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Jiexun WangClinical Research Unit, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Keven AngClinical Research Unit, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Darren YeoClinical Research Unit, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Chee Chew YipDepartment of ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Subramaniam TavintharanDepartment of Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Chee Fang SumDepartment of Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Su Chi LimDepartment of Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-4531
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision-loss globally among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Information on the economic burden of DR in Singapore is limited. We aim to identify the total annual direct medical costs of DR at different stages, and to examine factors influencing the costs. Four hundreds and seventy T2DM patients who attended the Diabetes Centre in a secondary hospital in Singapore in 2011-2014 were included. Digital color fundus photographs were assessed for DR in a masked fashion. Retinopathy severity was further categorized into non-proliferative DR (NPDR), including mild, moderate and severe NPDR, and proliferative DR (PDR). Medical costs were assessed using hospital administrative data. DR was diagnosed in 172 (39.5%) patients, including 51 mild, 62 moderate and 18 severe NPDR, and 41 PDR. The median cost in DR [2012.0 (1111.2-4192.3)] was significantly higher than that in non-DR patients [1158.1 (724.1-1838.9)] (p<0.001). The corresponding costs for mild, moderate, severe NPDR and PDR were [1167.1 (895.4-2012.0)], [2212.0 (1215.5-3825.5)], [2717.5 (1444.0-6310.7)], and [3594.8.1 (1978.4-8427.7)], respectively. After adjustment, the corresponding cost ratios for mild, moderate, severe NPDR, and PDR relative to non-DR were 1.1 (p = 0.827), 1.8 (p = 0.003), 2.0 (p = 0.031) and 2.3 (p<0.001), respectively. The other factors affecting the total cost include smoking (ratio = 1.7, p = 0.019), neuropathy (ratio = 1.9, p = 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ratio = 1.4, p = 0.019). The presence and severity of DR was associated with increased direct medical costs in T2DM. Our results suggest that preventing progression of DR may reduce the economic burden of DR.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSingaporeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28700742
PMCPMC5507311
OpenAlexW2735655118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.