Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700688›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

Four simple rules that are sufficient to generate the mammalian blastocyst.

Silas Boye Nissen, Marta Perera, Javier Martin Gonzalez, Sophie M Morgani, Mogens H Jensen, Kim Sneppen, Joshua M Brickman, Ala Trusina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The effects of embryo splitting onIranian journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Coordination between patterning and morphogenesis ensures robustness during mouse development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silas Boye NissenStemPhys, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marta PereraThe Danish Stem Cell Centre, DanStem, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Javier Martin GonzalezTransgenic Core Facility, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sophie M MorganiThe Danish Stem Cell Centre, DanStem, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mogens H JensenStemPhys, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim SneppenCMOL, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joshua M BrickmanStemPhys, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ala TrusinaStemPhys, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-454X
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early mammalian development is both highly regulative and self-organizing. It involves the interplay of cell position, predetermined gene regulatory networks, and environmental interactions to generate the physical arrangement of the blastocyst with precise timing. However, this process occurs in the absence of maternal information and in the presence of transcriptional stochasticity. How does the preimplantation embryo ensure robust, reproducible development in this context? It utilizes a versatile toolbox that includes complex intracellular networks coupled to cell-cell communication, segregation by differential adhesion, and apoptosis. Here, we ask whether a minimal set of developmental rules based on this toolbox is sufficient for successful blastocyst development, and to what extent these rules can explain mutant and experimental phenotypes. We implemented experimentally reported mechanisms for polarity, cell-cell signaling, adhesion, and apoptosis as a set of developmental rules in an agent-based in silico model of physically interacting cells. We find that this model quantitatively reproduces specific mutant phenotypes and provides an explanation for the emergence of heterogeneity without requiring any initial transcriptional variation. It also suggests that a fixed time point for the cells' competence of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) sets an embryonic clock that enables certain scaling phenomena, a concept that we evaluate quantitatively by manipulating embryos in vitro. Based on these observations, we conclude that the minimal set of rules enables the embryo to experiment with stochastic gene expression and could provide the robustness necessary for the evolutionary diversification of the preimplantation gene regulatory network.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationComputer SimulationEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCell PolarityMammalsModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID28700688
PMCPMC5507476
OpenAlexW2734775584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.