Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Highly diverse and antimicrobial susceptible Escherichia coli display a naïve bacterial population in fruit bats from the Republic of Congo.

Kathrin Nowak, Jakob Fahr, Natalie Weber, Antina Lübke-Becker, Torsten Semmler, Sabrina Weiss, Jean-Vivien Mombouli, Lothar H Wieler, Sebastian Guenther, Fabian H Leendertz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence and risk factors of antimicrobial resistance inOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Dominance ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Presence of β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacterales andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. The Kidney-Associated Microbiome of Wild-CaughtAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin NowakEpidemiology of highly pathogenic microorganisms, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Jakob FahrDepartment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany.
Natalie WeberInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Antina Lübke-BeckerInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten SemmlerInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sabrina WeissEpidemiology of highly pathogenic microorganisms, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Jean-Vivien MombouliLaboratoire nationale de la santé publique, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Lothar H WielerInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian GuentherInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Fabian H LeendertzEpidemiology of highly pathogenic microorganisms, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Christa EwersVeterinary Faculty, Institute of Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DERobert Koch Institute · DELaboratoire National de Santé Publique du Congo · CGTechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats are suspected to be a reservoir of several bacterial and viral pathogens relevant to animal and human health, but studies on Escherichia coli in these animals are sparse. We investigated the presence of E. coli in tissue samples (liver, lung and intestines) collected from 50 fruit bats of five different species (Eidolon helvum, Epomops franqueti, Hypsignathus monstrosus, Myonycteris torquata, Rousettus aegyptiacus) of two different areas in the Republic of Congo between 2009 and 2010. To assess E. coli pathotypes and phylogenetic relationships, we determined the presence of 59 virulence associated genes and multilocus sequence types (STs). Isolates were further tested for their susceptibility to several antimicrobial substances by agar disk diffusion test and for the presence of an Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase phenotype. E. coli was detected in 60% of the bats analysed. The diversity of E. coli strains was very high, with 37 different STs within 40 isolates. Occasionally, we detected sequence types (e.g. ST69, ST127, and ST131) and pathotypes (e.g. ExPEC, EPEC and atypical EPEC), which are known pathogens in human and/or animal infections. Although the majority of strains were assigned to phylogenetic group B2 (46.2%), which is linked with the ExPEC pathovar, occurrence of virulence-associated genes in these strains were unexpectedly low. Due to this, and as only few of the E. coli isolates showed intermediate resistance to certain antimicrobial substances, we assume a rather naïve E. coli population, lacking contact to humans or domestic animals. Future studies featuring in depth comparative whole genome sequence analyses will provide insights into the microevolution of this interesting strain collection.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialPhylogenyAnimalsChiropteraCongoEscherichia coliGenetic VariationIntestinesLiverLungVirulence

Identifiers

PMID28700648
PMCPMC5507484
OpenAlexW2736043211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.