Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28700371›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2017

Total pancreatectomy for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: a critical review of patient selection criteria.

Mahya Faghih, Francisco Garcia Gonzalez, Martin A Makary, Vikesh K Singh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahya FaghihaPancreatitis Center bDivision of Gastroenterology cDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Francisco Garcia Gonzalez
Martin A Makary
Vikesh K Singh
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH IN DIGESTIVE DISEASEST32DK007632 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DONOWITZ, MARK · 1989 to 2018
$5.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCritical review of the indications for total pancreatectomy and highlight limitations in current diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis. RECENT

findingsThe diagnosis of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis remains controversial because of an overreliance on nonspecific imaging and laboratories findings. Endoscopic ultrasound, s-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and/or endoscopic pancreatic function testing are often used to diagnose noncalcific chronic pancreatitis despite the fact that there is no gold standard for this condition. Abdominal pain is not specific for chronic pancreatitis and is more likely to be encountered in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders based on the high incidence of these conditions. The duration of pain and opioid analgesic use results in central sensitization that adversely affects pain outcomes after total pancreatectomy. An alcoholic cause is associated with poorer pain outcomes after total pancreatectomy. SUMMARY: The lack of a gold standard for noncalcific chronic pancreatitis limits the diagnostic accuracy of imaging and laboratory tests. The pain of chronic pancreatitis is nonspecific and is affected by duration, preoperative opioid use, and cause. These factors will need to be considered in the development of future selection criteria for this morbid surgery.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatectomyPatient SelectionAbdominal PainAcute DiseaseAlcoholismAnalgesics, OpioidChronic DiseaseHumansPancreatitisPostoperative PainPractice Guidelines as TopicRecurrenceSmokingAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID28700371
PMCPMC5881167
OpenAlexW2735664742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.