ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2017
Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: A New Clinical Phenotype.
Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Value of Myocardial Energy Expenditure in the Diagnosis of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Anti-Beta-1-Adrenergic Receptor Antibodies in Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients with Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2022Article
- Critically Ill COVID-19 Patient with Chronic Liver Disease - Insights into a Comprehensive Liver Intensive Care.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2021Review
- Syndecan-1: A Review on Its Role in Heart Failure and Chronic Liver Disease Patients' Assessment.Cardiology research and practice · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.