Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28699545›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Predictive models for pressure ulcers from intensive care unit electronic health records using Bayesian networks.

Pacharmon Kaewprag, Cheryl Newton, Brenda Vermillion, Sookyung Hyun, Kun Huang, Raghu Machiraju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predicting pressure injury using nursing assessment phenotypes and machine learning methods.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pacharmon KaewpragDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. kaewprag.1@osu.edu.
Cheryl NewtonDepartment of Critical Care Nursing, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Brenda VermillionCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sookyung HyunCollege of Nursing, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.
Kun HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Kun.Huang@osumc.edu.
Raghu MachirajuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. machiraju.1@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe develop predictive models enabling clinicians to better understand and explore patient clinical data along with risk factors for pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients from electronic health record data. Identifying accurate risk factors of pressure ulcers is essential to determining appropriate prevention strategies; in this work we examine medication, diagnosis, and traditional Braden pressure ulcer assessment scale measurements as patient features. In order to predict pressure ulcer incidence and better understand the structure of related risk factors, we construct Bayesian networks from patient features. Bayesian network nodes (features) and edges (conditional dependencies) are simplified with statistical network techniques. Upon reviewing a network visualization of our model, our clinician collaborators were able to identify strong relationships between risk factors widely recognized as associated with pressure ulcers.

methodsWe present a three-stage framework for predictive analysis of patient clinical data: 1) Developing electronic health record feature extraction functions with assistance of clinicians, 2) simplifying features, and 3) building Bayesian network predictive models. We evaluate all combinations of Bayesian network models from different search algorithms, scoring functions, prior structure initializations, and sets of features.

resultsFrom the EHRs of 7,717 ICU patients, we construct Bayesian network predictive models from 86 medication, diagnosis, and Braden scale features. Our model not only identifies known and suspected high PU risk factors, but also substantially increases sensitivity of the prediction - nearly three times higher comparing to logistical regression models - without sacrificing the overall accuracy. We visualize a representative model with which our clinician collaborators identify strong relationships between risk factors widely recognized as associated with pressure ulcers.

conclusionsGiven the strong adverse effect of pressure ulcers on patients and the high cost for treating pressure ulcers, our Bayesian network based model provides a novel framework for significantly improving the sensitivity of the prediction model. Thus, when the model is deployed in a clinical setting, the caregivers can suitably respond to conditions likely associated with pressure ulcer incidence.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalPressure UlcerAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung AdultBayesian networksElectronic health recordsIntensive care unitsModel learningPressure ulcers

Identifiers

PMID28699545
PMCPMC5506589
OpenAlexW2727607233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.