Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28699417›Full record

Trial reportActa orthopaedica2017

Comparison of metal ion concentrations and implant survival after total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene articulations.

Henrik Dahlstrand, André Stark, Marius C Wick, Lucas Anissian, Nils P Hailer, Rüdiger J Weiss

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prosthetic Metals: Release, Metabolism and Toxicity.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrik Dahlstranda Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine , Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm.
André Starkb Department of Clinical Sciences , Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm.
Marius C Wickc Functional Unit for Musculoskeletal Radiology, Function Imaging and Physiology , Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm , Sweden.
Lucas Anissiand Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Oregon Health Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Nils P Hailere Section of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Rüdiger J Weissa Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine , Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEOregon Health & Science University · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Large metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations are associated with metal wear and corrosion, leading to increased metal ion concentrations and unacceptable revision rates. There are few comparative studies of 28-mm MoM articulations with conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) couplings. We present a long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing MoM versus MoP 28-mm articulations, focused on metal ions and implant survival. Patients and methods - 85 patients with a mean age of 65 years at surgery were randomized to a MoM (Metasul) or a MoP (Protasul) bearing. After 16 years, 38 patients had died and 4 had undergone revision surgery. 13 patients were unavailable for clinical follow-up, leaving 30 patients (n = 14 MoM and n = 16 MoP) for analysis of metal ion concentrations and clinical outcome. Results - 15-year implant survival was similar in both groups (MoM 96% [95% CI 88-100] versus MoP 97% [95% CI 91-100]). The mean serum cobalt concentration was 4-fold higher in the MoM (1.5 μg/L) compared with the MoP cohort (0.4 μg/L, p < 0.001) and the mean chromium concentration was double in the MoM (2.2 μg/L) compared with the MoP cohort (1.0 μg/L, p = 0.05). Mean creatinine levels were similar in both groups (MoM 93 μmol/L versus MoP 92 μmol/L). Harris hip scores differed only marginally between the MoM and MoP cohorts. Interpretation - This is the longest follow-up of a randomized trial on 28-mm MoM articulations, and although implant survival in the 2 groups was similar, metal ion concentrations remained elevated in the MoM cohort even in the long term.

Indexed as

Metal-on-Metal Joint ProsthesesAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolyethyleneProsthesis FailureReoperationPolyethylene

Identifiers

PMID28699417
PMCPMC5560210
OpenAlexW2735403415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.