ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2017
ADC quantification in basilar artery occlusion as an indicator of clinical outcome after endovascular treatment.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram-Based Prediction of the Futile Recanalization Risk Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Before and After Endovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- Posterior Circulation ASPECTS on CT Angiography Predicts Futile Recanalization of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Restricted Lesions in a Differential Diagnosis of Status Epilepticus and Acute Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Multiple-Factor Analyses of Futile Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Futile Recanalization after Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.BioMed research international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is associated with a dismal prognosis and, even though endovascular treatment (EVT) contributed to an improvement in clinical outcomes, patient selection is difficult and frequently results in futile recanalization. We investigated the prognostic value of baseline ADC quantification in patients with BAO undergoing EVT. Methods We retrospectively evaluated MRI at admission in 11 patients with BAO undergoing EVT. Ischemic lesions were defined on baseline DWI and minimum ADC (minADC), ADC ratio and total area were quantified. Final infarction area was determined on follow-up T2WI/CT. We assessed the correlation between imaging parameters, recanalization grade and clinical scores (NIHSS at admission, NIHSS and mRS at discharge and mRS at three months) using Spearman rank correlation coefficient and correcting for multiple comparisons with the false discovery rate (FDR). Results Lower values of minADC at admission MRI are strongly correlated with higher scores in NIHSS (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.