Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28699094›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Emergency Contraception in Mexico: Trends in Knowledge and Ever-Use 2006-2014.

Leo Han, Biani Saavedra-Avendano, William Lambert, Rongwei Fu, Maria I Rodriguez, Alison Edelman, Blair Darney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leo HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Road, L 466, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. hanl@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-6028
Biani Saavedra-AvendanoNational Institute of Public Health, Center for Health Systems Research, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
William LambertSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Rongwei FuSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Maria I RodriguezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Road, L 466, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Alison EdelmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Road, L 466, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Blair DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Road, L 466, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

OHSU Women's Reproductive Health Research K12 ProgramK12HD085809 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron B Caughey · 2015 to 2026
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives A package of interventions to introduce emergency contraception (EC) to Mexico was implemented, resulting in the addition of EC to the national family planning guidelines in 2004. We describe EC knowledge and use among women in Mexico over time. Methods We used the 2006, 2009, and 2014 of waves of a nationally representative demographic survey (ENADID). We assessed EC knowledge and usage in women ages 15-29 who are not using permanent methods and tested whether EC knowledge and use is changing over time after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics using logistic regression. Results Our sample included n = 99,223 (population N = 40,234,355) women ages 15-29. Overall, knowledge of EC increased over time: 62% in 2006 to 79% in 2009 to 83% in 2014 (p < 0.001). Among young women who have used contraception (n = 42,883; N = 16,816,701), the proportion that reported EC use increased from 3 to 11% to 29% (p < 0.001). Compared to non-users, women who had ever used EC were more likely to be using no method of contraception (44 vs. 35%) or barrier method (22 vs. 17%). Demographic factors including lower wealth, lower education, indigenous status and rural living are significantly associated with less EC knowledge and use. Stratified multivariate analysis found that demographic disadvantages magnify lower EC use among rural residents compared to non-rural residents. Conclusions for Practice Knowledge and use of EC are growing rapidly in Mexico, but disparities persist in demographically disadvantaged women, particularly those living in rural areas. Women who use EC appear to be at higher risk of unintended pregnancy based on current contraceptive use.

Indexed as

Contraception, PostcoitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeResidence CharacteristicsSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMexicoPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationContraceptionEmergency contraceptionENADIDMexico

Identifiers

PMID28699094
OpenAlexW2734908423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.