Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28699084›Full record

Observational studyTargeted oncology2017

EGFR Mutation Testing of non-squamous NSCLC: Impact and Uptake during Implementation of Testing Guidelines in a Population-Based Registry Cohort from Northern New Zealand.

Mark McKeage, Mark Elwood, Sandar Tin Tin, Prashannata Khwaounjoo, Phyu Aye, Angie Li, Karen Sheath, Phillip Shepherd, George Laking, Nicola Kingston and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Targeted oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark McKeageUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. m.mckeage@auckland.ac.nz.
Mark ElwoodUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sandar Tin TinUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Prashannata KhwaounjooUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Phyu AyeUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Angie LiUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Karen SheathLabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Phillip ShepherdUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
George LakingAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicola KingstonLabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher LewisAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Donald LoveLabPlus, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZAuckland City Hospital · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 13/981Health Research Council of New Zealand 15/087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2013, clinical practice guidelines recommend EGFR mutation testing of non-squamous NSCLC to select advanced-stage patients for first-line treatment using EGFR-TKIs.

objectiveWe aimed to determine population-based trends in the real-world uptake and impact in routine practice of these recently updated testing guidelines. PATIENTS AND

methodsA population-based observational study was conducted of notifications to the New Zealand Cancer Registry of patients eligible for EGFR testing diagnosed in northern New Zealand between January 2010 and April 2014. The main study variable was EGFR mutation testing. Main outcome measures (overall survival and dispensing of EGFR-TKIs) were extracted from prospectively archived electronic databases until October 2015.

resultsThe population-based cohort of 1857 patients had an average age of 70 years. Most had adenocarcinoma and metastatic disease at diagnosis. EGFR testing was undertaken in 500 patients (27%) with mutations detected in 109 patients (22%). EGFR testing increased during the period of study from <5% to 67% of patients (P < 0.0001). Full uptake of testing by all eligible patients was limited by a lack of availability of specimens for testing and variable testing referral practices. The proportion of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs decreased during the same time period, both among untested patients (from 12.2% to 2.8% (P < 0.0001)) and in the population as a whole (from 13.7% to 10.6% (P < 0.05)). EGFR testing was associated with prolonged overall survival (Adjusted HR = 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.89) Log-rank P < 0.0001) due at least in part to the much longer overall survival achieved by mutation-positive patients, of whom 79% received EGFR-TKIs. Compared to untested EGFR-TKI-treated patients, mutation-positive EGFR-TKI-treated patients received EGFR-TKIs for longer, and survived longer both from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment and date of their diagnosis.

conclusionsIn this real world setting, high uptake of EGFR testing was achieved and associated with major changes in EGFR-TKI prescribing and improved health outcomes. Modifiable factors determined testing uptake. Study registration ACTRN12615000998549.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandRegistriesEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID28699084
OpenAlexW2735143892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.