ArticleMycopathologia2017
Killing Activity of Micafungin Against Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis and Candida africana in the Presence of Human Serum.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Efficacy of humanized single large doses of caspofungin on the lethality and fungal tissue burden in a deeply neutropenic murine model againstInfection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Comparison of Killing Activity of Micafungin Against Six Candida Species Isolated from Peritoneal and Pleural Cavities in RPMI-1640, 10 and 30% Serum.Mycopathologia · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We compared killing activity of micafungin in time-kill experiments in RPMI-1640 with and without 50% serum against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana reference strains and clinical isolates. Killing rates (k values) were determined for each strain and concentration. In RPMI-1640 MIC ranges were 0.015-0.03, 0.015-0.03 and 0.015 mg/L against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis and C. africana, respectively. In 50% serum MIC values for the three species increased 16- to 64-fold. In RPMI-1640 micafungin was fungicidal against two of three C. albicans isolates at 16 and 32 mg/L within 14.54 h and fungistatic against all C. africana and C. dubliniensis. Fifty per cent serum significantly decreased the growth rate of C. africana, but not of the other two species; weak in vivo replication ability of C. africana was confirmed in murine model. In 50% serum micafungin at 0.25 and 1 mg/L did not inhibit any of the three species (k values were always negative). Micafungin killing rate in 50% serum at 4, 16 and 32 mg/L was significantly decreased for C. albicans, but increased for C. dubliniensis compared to RPMI-1640. Killing activity of micafungin against C. africana was comparable or higher in 50% serum than in RPMI-1640. Although micafungin is a highly protein-bound drug, it was equally effective against the species of the C. albicans complex in 50% serum at therapeutic trough concentration (4 mg/L). Both in vitro and in vivo data confirmed the low virulence of C. africana compared to the two sibling species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.