ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017
Position-related renal perfusion disturbances as a possible underestimated mechanism in patients with resistant hypertension: a case vignette.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orthostatic hypertension: From pathophysiology to clinical applications and therapeutic considerations.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn patients with resistant hypertension and large blood pressure fluctuations, the role of orthostatic hypertension, associated with position-dependent renal perfusion disturbances, has not been investigated in detail yet.
methodsIn this regard, four patients from our outpatient clinic were investigated by the use of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), active standing test, renal duplex sonography and Tc99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine [MAG3] renal scintigraphy in supine and upright position.
resultsFour patients (three males and one female; 51-79 years) with a mean of 4.25 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic were evaluated. The recorded blood pressure fluctuations were up to 89/58-198/121 mmHg. Three patients exhibited an extreme and one a normal dipping pattern in the 24-h ABPM. Three patients demonstrated a hypertensive orthostatic reaction in the active standing test. By duplex sonography, a bilateral decrease in the overall intrarenal resistive indices was shown in two patients, a unilateral overall decrease in one patient and a localized decrease in the last patient. From a morphological standpoint of view, all patients had a normal anatomical position and a physiologic descent of both kidneys. But the normalized tubular extraction rate was pathologic in all patients in the upright body position and normalized when lying down in three patients.
conclusionsPosition-dependent renal perfusion should be considered in patients with large blood pressure fluctuations and extreme dipping. If morphological imaging shows no abnormalities, functional imaging provides additional information. Further investigation is needed, foremost if nephropexy could improve blood pressure control in some of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.