Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698923›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology2017

Sequence symmetry analysis in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Nicole Pratt, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Swu-Jane Lin, Anton Pottegård, Elizabeth E Roughead, Yea-Huei Kao Yang, Jesper Hallas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Loop diuretics and subsequent use of urinary symptom medications in older adults: evaluation of a possible prescribing cascade.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Core Concepts: Self-Controlled Designs in Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward Chia-Cheng LaiSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Nicole PrattQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Cheng-Yang HsiehSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Swu-Jane LinDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anton PottegårdClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Elizabeth E RougheadQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. libby.roughead@unisa.edu.au.
Yea-Huei Kao YangSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. yhkao@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Jesper HallasClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. jhallas@health.sdu.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) is a method for detecting adverse drug events by utilizing computerized claims data. The method has been increasingly used to investigate safety concerns of medications and as a pharmacovigilance tool to identify unsuspected side effects. Validation studies have indicated that SSA has moderate sensitivity and high specificity and has robust performance. In this review we present the conceptual framework of SSA and discuss advantages and potential pitfalls of the method in practice. SSA is based on analyzing the sequences of medications; if one medication (drug B) is more often initiated after another medication (drug A) than before, it may be an indication of an adverse effect of drug A. The main advantage of the method is that it requires a minimal dataset and is computationally efficient. By design, SSA controls time-constant confounders. However, the validity of SSA may be affected by time-varying confounders, as well as by time trends in the occurrence of exposure or outcome events. Trend effects may be adjusted by modeling the expected sequence ratio in the absence of a true association. There is a potential for false positive or negative results and careful consideration should be given to potential sources of bias when interpreting the results of SSA studies.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansPharmacoepidemiologyPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCase-based designPharmacoepidemiologyPharmacovigilanceSelf-control methodSequence symmetry analysisSignal detection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.