Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698908›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2017

[Adult autopsies during the past decade in Germany : Data from two university hospitals].

F Erlmeier, W Weichert, R Knüchel, J Andruszkow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Legal and organizational aspects of autopsy in Germany].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Post-Mortem Examination as a Quality Improvement Instrument.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F ErlmeierInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, Trogerstr. 18, 81675, München, Deutschland. f.erlmeier@tum.de.
W WeichertInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, Trogerstr. 18, 81675, München, Deutschland.
R KnüchelInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
J AndruszkowInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEGerman Marine Research Consortium · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical autopsy is the ultimate medical service for a patient and plays a crucial role in the education of physicians and other medical personnel, as well as in the context of quality control. Nevertheless, the number of autopsies is constantly decreasing. Numerous factors, such as the personal attitude of relatives and also clarification of relatives, as well as the increasing application of imaging methods while the patient is still alive, play a central role in this decline.

objectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate the development of autopsy services over the past decade in two university hospitals in Germany and therefore to underline the importance of this investigation procedure in pathology. MATERIAL AND

methodsAutopsy reports between the years 2005 and 2014 from 2 university institutes of pathology were analyzed regarding a diverse dataset, including age and sex of the deceased as well as the clinical and pathological causes of death.

resultsThe data showed that the number of autopsies has continuously decreased over the past decade; however, the distribution of characteristics of the deceased remained relatively stable. In this cohort the clinically assumed cause of death differed from the pathological cause of death in 6% of the autopsies. Frequently occurring discrepant diagnoses were cardiac tamponade, aortic dissection and endocarditis/myocarditis. DISCUSSION: Our results show that, despite significant improvements in imaging methods, findings do not yield more accurate results than does autopsy. This underscores once again the need to encourage the performance of this final medical act on patients.

Indexed as

AdultAortic DissectionAttitudeAutopsyCardiac TamponadeCause of DeathCohort StudiesDatasets as TopicDiagnostic ErrorsDiagnostic ImagingEndocarditisGermanyHospitals, UniversityHumansMyocarditisPrevalenceAutopsyDecreasing autopsy frequencyDevelopmentImaging methodQuality control

Identifiers

PMID28698908
OpenAlexW2735823984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.