Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Reading-induced shifts of perceptual speech representations in auditory cortex.

Milene Bonte, Joao M Correia, Mirjam Keetels, Jean Vroomen, Elia Formisano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural Prediction Errors Distinguish Perception and Misperception of Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Recalibration of vocal affect by a dynamic face.Experimental brain research · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milene BonteDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.bonte@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Joao M CorreiaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mirjam KeetelsDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Jean VroomenDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Elia FormisanoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-2460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to read requires the formation of efficient neural associations between written and spoken language. Whether these associations influence the auditory cortical representation of speech remains unknown. Here we address this question by combining multivariate functional MRI analysis and a newly-developed 'text-based recalibration' paradigm. In this paradigm, the pairing of visual text and ambiguous speech sounds shifts (i.e. recalibrates) the perceptual interpretation of the ambiguous sounds in subsequent auditory-only trials. We show that it is possible to retrieve the text-induced perceptual interpretation from fMRI activity patterns in the posterior superior temporal cortex. Furthermore, this auditory cortical region showed significant functional connectivity with the inferior parietal lobe (IPL) during the pairing of text with ambiguous speech. Our findings indicate that reading-related audiovisual mappings can adjust the auditory cortical representation of speech in typically reading adults. Additionally, they suggest the involvement of the IPL in audiovisual and/or higher-order perceptual processes leading to this adjustment. When applied in typical and dyslexic readers of different ages, our text-based recalibration paradigm may reveal relevant aspects of perceptual learning and plasticity during successful and failing reading development.

Indexed as

ReadingAdultAuditory CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeSpeechSpeech PerceptionTemporal LobeVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28698606
PMCPMC5506038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.