Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698555›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Association between duration of breastfeeding and malocclusions in primary and mixed dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Montserrat Boronat-Catalá, José María Montiel-Company, Carlos Bellot-Arcís, José Manuel Almerich-Silla, Montserrat Catalá-Pizarro

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Does breastfeeding have a long-term positive effect on dental occlusion?Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Montserrat Boronat-CataláDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Montse_boronat@hotmail.com.
José María Montiel-CompanyDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Bellot-ArcísDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José Manuel Almerich-SillaDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Montserrat Catalá-PizarroDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the current evidence on the possible effects of breastfeeding on different malocclusion traits in primary and mixed dentition. A systematic search was made in three databases, using terms related to breastfeeding and malocclusion in primary and mixed dentition. Of the 31 articles that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, nine were included in the quantitative analysis. The quality of the 31 observational studies was moderate to high on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. It was found that the odds ratio for the risk of posterior crossbite was 3.76 (95% CI 2.01-7.03) on comparing children who had not been breastfed, with those breastfed for over six months, and rose to 8.78 (95% CI 1.67-46.1) when those not breastfed were compared to those breastfed for over twelve months. The odds ratio for class II malocclusion in children breastfed for up to six months compared to those breastfed for over six months was 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.55). Lastly, children who were breastfed for up to six months had an odds ratio of 1.73 (95% CI 1.35-2.22) for non-spaced dentition compared to those who were breastfed for over six months.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDentition, MixedAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusionOdds RatioTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28698555
PMCPMC5505989
OpenAlexW2726335319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.