Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698373›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Genetic identification of a hindbrain nucleus essential for innate vocalization.

Luis Rodrigo Hernandez-Miranda, Pierre-Louis Ruffault, Julien C Bouvier, Andrew J Murray, Marie-Pierre Morin-Surun, Niccolò Zampieri, Justyna B Cholewa-Waclaw, Elodie Ey, Jean-Francois Brunet, Jean Champagnat and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maternal experience alters brain-wide representation of infant cries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis Rodrigo Hernandez-MirandaMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany; luis.hernandes@mdc-berlin.de Jean.Champagnat@inaf.cnrs-gif.fr gilles.fortin@cnrs.fr cbirch@mdc-berlin.de.
Pierre-Louis RuffaultMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Julien C BouvierParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, UMR9197/CNRS, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-4426
Andrew J MurrayHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Marie-Pierre Morin-SurunParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, UMR9197/CNRS, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France.
Niccolò ZampieriMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Justyna B Cholewa-WaclawMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Elodie EyPasteur Institute, 75015 Paris, France.
Jean-Francois BrunetInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1985-6103
Jean ChampagnatParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, UMR9197/CNRS, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France; luis.hernandes@mdc-berlin.de Jean.Champagnat@inaf.cnrs-gif.fr gilles.fortin@cnrs.fr cbirch@mdc-berlin.de.
Gilles FortinParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, UMR9197/CNRS, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France; luis.hernandes@mdc-berlin.de Jean.Champagnat@inaf.cnrs-gif.fr gilles.fortin@cnrs.fr cbirch@mdc-berlin.de.
Carmen BirchmeierMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany; luis.hernandes@mdc-berlin.de Jean.Champagnat@inaf.cnrs-gif.fr gilles.fortin@cnrs.fr cbirch@mdc-berlin.de.
Max Delbrück Center · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocalization in young mice is an innate response to isolation or mechanical stimulation. Neuronal circuits that control vocalization and breathing overlap and rely on motor neurons that innervate laryngeal and expiratory muscles, but the brain center that coordinates these motor neurons has not been identified. Here, we show that the hindbrain nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) is essential for vocalization in mice. By generating genetically modified newborn mice that specifically lack excitatory NTS neurons, we show that they are both mute and unable to produce the expiratory drive required for vocalization. Furthermore, the muteness of these newborns results in maternal neglect. We also show that neurons of the NTS directly connect to and entrain the activity of spinal (L1) and nucleus ambiguus motor pools located at positions where expiratory and laryngeal motor neurons reside. These motor neurons control expiratory pressure and laryngeal tension, respectively, thereby establishing the essential biomechanical parameters used for vocalization. In summary, our work demonstrates that the NTS is an obligatory component of the neuronal circuitry that transforms breaths into calls.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornFemaleLaryngeal MusclesMaternal BehaviorMiceMotor NeuronsPregnancyRespirationSolitary NucleusVocalization, AnimalexpirationhindbrainOlig3premotor neuronsvocalization

Identifiers

PMID28698373
PMCPMC5544295
OpenAlexW2735106548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.