Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698319›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home (sPATH) intervention: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial using motivational interviewing to decrease re-hospitalisation for patients with COPD or heart failure.

Maria Flink, Marléne Lindblad, Oscar Frykholm, Åsa Kneck, Per Nilsen, Kristofer Årestedt, Mirjam Ekstedt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02823795 (The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02823795 nacompletednot on this map

The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home (sPATH) Intervention - a Study Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2016 to 2018Enrolled118ConditionsMedication Adherence, Self-care, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsMotivational Interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria FlinkDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marléne LindbladDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oscar FrykholmDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Åsa KneckDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per NilsenDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kristofer ÅrestedtSchool of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SELinnaeus University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeficient hospital discharging and patients struggling to handle postdischarge self-management have been identified as potential causes of re-hospitalisation rates. Despite an increased interest in interventions aiming to reduce re-hospitalisation rates, there is yet no best evidence on how to support patients in being active participants in their self-management postdischarge. The aim of this paper is to describe the study protocol for an upcoming randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Supporting Patient in Activation to Home (sPATH) intervention. METHODS/ANALYSIS: The described study is a randomised, controlled, analysis-blinded, two-site trial, with primary outcome re-hospitalisation within 90 days. In total, 290 participants aged 18 years or older with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure who are admitted to hospital and who are living in an own home will be eligible for inclusion into an intervention (n=145) or control group (n=145). Patients who need an interpreter to communicate in Swedish, or who have a diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment, will be excluded from inclusion. The sPATH intervention, developed with a theoretical base in the self-determination theory, consists of five postdischarge motivational interviewing sessions (face to face or by phone). The intervention covers the self-management areas medication management, follow-up/care plan, symptoms/signs of worsening condition and relations/contacts with healthcare providers. This RCT will add to the literature on evidence to support patient activation in postdischarge self-management. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee (No. 2014/1498-31/2) in Stockholm, Sweden. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international and national scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02823795; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth TransitionMotivational InterviewingHeart FailureHumansPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeResearch DesignSelf CareSwedenTime FactorsChronic airways diseaseHeart failuremotivational interviewingProtocols & guidelinesre-hospitalization

Identifiers

PMID28698319
PMCPMC5734357
OpenAlexW2734716182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.