ReviewNeuroImage2018
Imaging at ultrahigh magnetic fields: History, challenges, and solutions.
Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.
- Voxel-Matching NORDIC: Non-local patch formation by time-series similarity increases tSNR in high-resolution BOLD fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2026Review
- Mesoscale Whole-Brain TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A Numerical Alternative to MR Thermometry for Safety Validation of Multi-Channel RF Transmit Coils.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Functional MRI of the Human Hippocampus at 10.5T: Pushing the Boundaries of Spatial Resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- 10.5 T In Vivo Head Imaging With Universal RF Shimming.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging of Embryonic and Fetal Brain Development Using MRI Microscopy: Achieving High Spatial Resolution.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing whole-brain BOLD functional MRI in humans at 10.5 T with motion-robust 3D echo-planar imaging, parallel transmission, and high-density radiofrequency receive coils.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Scalable spokes pTx pulses for 2D turbo-spin-echo imaging at 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Divergence unveils further distinct phenotypic traits of human brain connectomics fingerprint.iScience · 2026Article
- Study protocol for the Champaign-Urbana population study.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Article
- Multimodal MRI to elucidate cross-organ coupling mechanisms of the heart-brain axis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- In vivo evaluation of population-specific inversion pulses in parallel transmission.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of brain volumetry in patients with non-lesional epilepsy on 3 and 7 T MPRAGE.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Multi-center benchmarking of cervical spinal cord RF coils for 7 T MRI: A traveling spines study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Neurochemical Profiles of Prefrontal Cortex and Hypothalamus at 3 and 7 T During Controlled Euglycemia: Evaluation in a Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Advanced preclinical functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- A 128-channel receive array with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio performance for 10.5T brain imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Following early efforts in applying nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to study biological processes in intact systems, and particularly since the introduction of 4 T human scanners circa 1990, rapid progress was made in imaging and spectroscopy studies of humans at 4 T and animal models at 9.4 T, leading to the introduction of 7 T and higher magnetic fields for human investigation at about the turn of the century. Work conducted on these platforms has provided numerous technological solutions to challenges posed at these ultrahigh fields, and demonstrated the existence of significant advantages in signal-to-noise ratio and biological information content. Primary difference from lower fields is the deviation from the near field regime at the radiofrequencies (RF) corresponding to hydrogen resonance conditions. At such ultrahigh fields, the RF is characterized by attenuated traveling waves in the human body, which leads to image non-uniformities for a given sample-coil configuration because of destructive and constructive interferences. These non-uniformities were initially considered detrimental to progress of imaging at high field strengths. However, they are advantageous for parallel imaging in signal reception and transmission, two critical technologies that account, to a large extend, for the success of ultrahigh fields. With these technologies and improvements in instrumentation and imaging methods, today ultrahigh fields have provided unprecedented gains in imaging of brain function and anatomy, and started to make inroads into investigation of the human torso and extremities. As extensive as they are, these gains still constitute a prelude to what is to come given the increasingly larger effort committed to ultrahigh field research and development of ever better instrumentation and techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.