Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698070›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017

Surgical preparation of rats and mice for intravital microscopic imaging of abdominal organs.

George J Rhodes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Indiana O'Brien Center for Advanced Renal Microscopic Analysis.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Intravital Imaging Techniques for Biomedical and Clinical Research.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Review
  10. Fluorescent Imaging and Microscopy for Dynamic Processes in Rats.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George J RhodesIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, 950 W. Walnut St, R2-234, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. Electronic address: grhodes@iu.edu.

Funding

PROBE DELIVERY COREP30DK079312 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOLITORIS, BRUCE A · 2007 to 2021
$17.1M
Proximal Tubule Albumin Transport in Disease States.R01DK091623 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOLITORIS, BRUCE A · 2011 to 2021
$4.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079312NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravital microscopy is a powerful research tool that can provide insight into cellular and subcellular events that take place in organs in the body. However, meaningful results can only be obtained from animals whose physiology is preserved during the process of microscopy. Here I discuss the importance of preserving the overall state of health of the animal, methods of anesthesia, surgical techniques for intravital microscopy of various abdominal organs, methods to maintain and monitor the physiology of the animal during microscopy and associated peri- and post-operative recovery considerations.

Indexed as

Pericardial Window TechniquesAbdomenAnesthetics, DissociativeAnimalsFemaleIntravital MicroscopyKetamineMaleMicePostoperative PainRatsAnesthetics, DissociativeKetamineAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAnimal surgeryAseptic techniqueImaging windowIntravital microscopy

Identifiers

PMID28698070
PMCPMC5600691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.