Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28698031›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2017

Comparable impediment of cognitive function in female and male rats subsequent to daily administration of haloperidol after traumatic brain injury.

Kristin E Free, Anna M Greene, Corina O Bondi, Naima Lajud, Patricia B de la Tremblaye, Anthony E Kline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex-based differences of antioxidant enzyme nanoparticle effects following traumatic brain injury.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex Differences in Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of experimental neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristin E FreePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Anna M GreenePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Corina O BondiPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Naima LajudPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Morelia, Mexico.
Patricia B de la TremblayePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Anthony E KlinePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: klineae@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Training in the Neurobiology of Neurological DiseaseT32NS086749 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Omar El Gharbawie, REBECCA P SEAL · 2014 to 2026
$4.8M
Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Multimodal Assessment of Behavioral flexibility after Frontal Brain TraumaR21NS099683 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Sustained Attention and Executive Functioning After Brain TraumaR03NS094950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060005NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084967NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS094950NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099683NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS086749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol (HAL), are prescribed in the clinic to manage traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced agitation. While preclinical studies have consistently shown that once-daily administration of HAL hinders functional recovery after TBI in male rats, its effects in females are unknown. Hence, the objective of this study was to directly compare neurobehavioral and histological outcomes in both sexes to determine whether the reported deleterious effects of HAL extend to females. Anesthetized adult female and male rats received either a controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to a dosing regimen of HAL (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (VEH; 1mL/kg, i.p.) that was initiated 24h after injury and continued once daily for 19 consecutive days. Motor function was tested using established beam-balance/walk protocols on post-operative days 1-5 and acquisition of spatial learning was assessed with a well-validated Morris water maze task on days 14-19. Cortical lesion volume was quantified at 21days. No statistical differences were revealed between the HAL and VEH-treated sham groups and thus they were pooled for each sex. HAL only impaired motor recovery in males (p<0.05), but significantly diminished spatial learning in both sexes (p<0.05). Females, regardless of treatment, exhibited smaller cortical lesions vs VEH-treated males (p<0.05). Taken together, the data show that daily HAL does not prohibit motor recovery in females, but does negatively impact cognition. These task-dependent differential effects of HAL in female vs male rats may have clinical significance as they can direct therapy.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognitionDisease Models, AnimalEstrous CycleFemaleHaloperidolMaleMotor ActivityNeurologic ExaminationPsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidolAntipsychotic drugBeam-walkingBehaviorControlled cortical impact (CCI)Functional recoveryHaloperidolHippocampusLearning and memoryMorris water mazeSexTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID28698031
PMCPMC5557279
OpenAlexW2727155092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.