Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28697740›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Incorporating biological information in sparse principal component analysis with application to genomic data.

Ziyi Li, Sandra E Safo, Qi Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A novel autophagy-related lncRNA prognostic risk model for breast cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Predictive Model Assessing Genetic Susceptibility Risk at Workplace.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziyi LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, 30322, GA, USA.
Sandra E SafoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, 30322, GA, USA.
Qi LongDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA. qlong@mail.med.upenn.edu.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Emory University BIRCWH ProgramK12HD085850 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OFOTOKUN, IGHOVWERHA, STERK, CLAIRE E · 2015 to 2023
$4.4M
Feature Selection for Genomic Data Using Known and Novel Biological InformationR03CA183006 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, QI · 2014 to 2015
$154k
Evaluating Prediction Models for Cancer Endpoints Subject to Dependent CensoringR03CA173770 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, QI · 2013 to 2014
$152k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R03 CA173770NCI NIH HHS R03 CA183006NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSparse principal component analysis (PCA) is a popular tool for dimensionality reduction, pattern recognition, and visualization of high dimensional data. It has been recognized that complex biological mechanisms occur through concerted relationships of multiple genes working in networks that are often represented by graphs. Recent work has shown that incorporating such biological information improves feature selection and prediction performance in regression analysis, but there has been limited work on extending this approach to PCA. In this article, we propose two new sparse PCA methods called Fused and Grouped sparse PCA that enable incorporation of prior biological information in variable selection.

resultsOur simulation studies suggest that, compared to existing sparse PCA methods, the proposed methods achieve higher sensitivity and specificity when the graph structure is correctly specified, and are fairly robust to misspecified graph structures. Application to a glioblastoma gene expression dataset identified pathways that are suggested in the literature to be related with glioblastoma.

conclusionsThe proposed sparse PCA methods Fused and Grouped sparse PCA can effectively incorporate prior biological information in variable selection, leading to improved feature selection and more interpretable principal component loadings and potentially providing insights on molecular underpinnings of complex diseases.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisAlgorithmsGenomicsHumansGenomic dataPrincipal component analysisSparsityStructural information

Identifiers

PMID28697740
PMCPMC5504598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.