Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28697736›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2017

End-of-life perceptions among physicians in intensive care units managed by anesthesiologists in Germany: a survey about structure, current implementation and deficits.

Manfred Weiss, Andrej Michalsen, Anke Toenjes, Franz Porzsolt, Thomas Bein, Marc Theisen, Alexander Brinkmann, Heinrich Groesdonk, Christian Putensen, Friedhelm Bach and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. End-of-life practices in 11 German intensive care units : Results from the ETHICUS-2 study.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manfred WeissClinic of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Medical School, Alber-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. manfred.weiss@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4851-6439
Andrej MichalsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tettnang Hospital, Tettnang, Germany.
Anke ToenjesClinic of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Medical School, Alber-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Franz PorzsoltInstitute of Clinical Economics, Health Care Research at the Hospital of General and Visceral Surgery University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas BeinDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Marc TheisenPalliative Care Einheit, Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin, Schmerztherapie, Raphaelsklinik GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexander BrinkmannKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany.
Heinrich GroesdonkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Christian PutensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Friedhelm BachKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Transfusions-, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie (AINS), Ev. Krankenhaus Bielefeld, Akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der WWU Münster, Bielefeld, Germany.
Dietrich HenzlerUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, op. Intensivmedizin, Rettungsmedizin, Schmerztherapie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Klinikum Herford, Herford, Germany.
On behalf on the Working Group Epidemiology and Ethics of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructural aspects and current practice about end-of-life (EOL) decisions in German intensive care units (ICUs) managed by anesthesiologists are unknown. A survey among intensive care anesthesiologists has been conducted to explore current practice, barriers and opinions on EOL decisions in ICU.

methodsIn November 2015, all members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthesiologists (BDA) were asked to participate in an online survey to rate the presence or absence and the importance of 50 items. Answers were grouped into three categories considering implementation and relevance: Category 1 reflects high implementation and high relevance, Category 2 low and low, and Category 3 low and high.

resultsFive-hundred and forty-one anesthesiologists responded. Only four items reached ≥90% agreement as being performed "yes, always" or "mostly", and 29 items were rated "very" or "more important". A profound discrepancy between current practice and attributed importance was revealed. Twenty-eight items attributed to Category 1, six to Category 2 and sixteen to Category 3. Items characterizing the most urgent need for improvement (Category 3) referred to patient outcome data, preparation of health care directives and interdisciplinary discussion, standard operating procedures, implementation of practical instructions and inclusion of nursing staff and families in the process.

conclusionThe present survey affirms an urgent need for improvement in EOL practice in German ICUs focusing on advanced care planning, distinct aspects of changing goals of care, implementation of standard operating procedures, continuing education and reporting of outcome data.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsAttitude of Health PersonnelIntensive Care UnitsPalliative CareClinical Decision-MakingGermanyHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesAnesthesiologistsEducation, ContinuingEnd-of-life careGoalsIntensive care unitsPalliative carePatient care planningPrognosisQuality of lifeSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28697736
PMCPMC5504988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.