ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017
Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthTrial
- How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low-Income Postpartum Texans: A Counterfactual Analysis of Pregnancy Trajectories.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Public Coverage of Postpartum Services for Immigrants.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to contraception provision among rural healthcare providers.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.Health services research · 2024Observational
- Perspectives from the pandemic epicenter: Sexual and reproductive health of immigrant women in New York City.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Where Do Reproductive-Aged Women Want to Get Contraception?Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Medicaid and Fulfillment of Postpartum Permanent Contraception Requests.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage.PloS one · 2023Article
- The role of legal status and uncertainty in the reproductive aspirations of 1.5 and second generation Mexican-origin immigrant young women: An exploratory study.Journal of migration and health · 2023Article
- Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Incorporating Black women's perspectives into long-acting reversible contraception implementation.F&S reports · 2022Article
- Obtaining buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals: A qualitative study.Contraception · 2022Article
- Mi Familia Entera: Contraceptive Use Among Spanish-Speaking Mothers of Young Children.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Improving assessment of demand for postpartum tubal ligation among publicly insured women in Texas.Contraception · 2021Article
- Analysis of Postpartum Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Before and After Implementation of Medicaid Reimbursement Policy.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Are rural Malawian women using their preferred contraceptive method and that of their male partners?Contraception · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess women's preferences for contraception after delivery and to compare use with preferences.
methodsIn a prospective cohort study of women aged 18-44 years who wanted to delay childbearing for at least 2 years, we interviewed 1,700 participants from eight hospitals in Texas immediately postpartum and at 3 and 6 months after delivery. At 3 months, we assessed contraceptive preferences by asking what method women would like to be using at 6 months. We modeled preference for highly effective contraception and use given preference according to childbearing intentions using mixed-effects logistic regression testing for variability across hospitals and differences between those with and without immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) provision.
resultsApproximately 80% completed both the 3- and 6-month interviews (1,367/1,700). Overall, preferences exceeded use for both-LARC: 40.8% (n=547) compared with 21.9% (n=293) and sterilization: 36.1% (n=484) compared with 17.5% (n=235). In the mixed-effects logistic regression models, several demographic variables were associated with a preference for LARC among women who wanted more children, but there was no significant variability across hospitals. For women who wanted more children and had a LARC preference, use of LARC was higher in the hospital that offered immediate postpartum provision (P<.035) as it was for U.S.-born women (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.17-3.69) and women with public prenatal care providers (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.13-3.69). In the models for those who wanted no more children, there was no significant variability in preferences for long-acting or permanent methods across hospitals. However, use given preference varied across hospitals (P<.001) and was lower for black women (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.55) and higher for U.S.-born women (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.36-3.96), those 30 years of age and older (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.07-3.09), and those with public prenatal care providers (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.18-3.51).
conclusionLimited use of long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods after delivery is associated with indicators of health care provider and system-level barriers. Expansion of immediate postpartum LARC provision as well as contraceptive coverage for undocumented women could reduce the gap between preference and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.