Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28697053›Full record

ArticlePancreas2017

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With Gemcitabine and Adoptive Immunotherapy.

Hiroto Matsui, Shoichi Hazama, Kazuhiko Sakamoto, Yoshitaro Shindo, Shinsuke Kanekiyo, Masao Nakashima, Satoshi Matsukuma, Yoshihiro Tokuhisa, Michihisa Iida, Nobuaki Suzuki and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pancreas, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immunologic Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer: MakingJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The dark side of immunotherapy: pancreatic cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Impact of Immunotherapy after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroto MatsuiFrom the *Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine; †Department of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics Against Cancer, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi; ‡Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo; and §Oncology Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Shoichi Hazama
Kazuhiko Sakamoto
Yoshitaro Shindo
Shinsuke Kanekiyo
Masao Nakashima
Satoshi Matsukuma
Yoshihiro Tokuhisa
Michihisa Iida
Nobuaki Suzuki
Kiyoshi Yoshimura
Shigeru Takeda
Tomio Ueno
Shigefumi Yoshino
Masaaki Oka
Hiroaki Nagano
Yamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe previously described adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) with cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) stimulated by the mucin 1 (MUC1)-expressing human pancreatic cancer cell line YPK-1 (MUC1-CTLs) and demonstrated that MUC1-CTLs might prevent liver metastasis. In the present study, we combined gemcitabine (GEM) and AIT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

methodsA total of 43 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy received treatment with MUC1-CTLs and GEM. After surgery, MUC1-CTLs were induced and administered intravenously 3 times, and GEM administered according to the standard regimen for 6 months. The patients whose relative dose intensity of GEM was 50% or more and who received 2 or more MUC1-CTL treatments were used as the adequate treatment group (n = 21).

resultsIn the adequate treatment group, disease-free survival was 15.8 months, and overall survival was 24.7 months. Liver metastasis was found only in 7 patients (33%), and local recurrence occurred in 4 patients (19%). The independent prognostic factor of long-term disease-free survival on multivariate analysis was the average number of CTLs administered (P = 0.0133).

conclusionsThe combination therapy with AIT and GEM prevented liver metastasis and local recurrence. Moreover, the disease free-survival was improved in patients who received sufficient CTLs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukopeniaLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID28697053
PMCPMC5555975
OpenAlexW2734967882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.