Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28696504›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Association of MYCN copy number with clinical features, tumor biology, and outcomes in neuroblastoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Kevin Campbell, Julie M Gastier-Foster, Meegan Mann, Arlene H Naranjo, Collin Van Ryn, Rochelle Bagatell, Katherine K Matthay, Wendy B London, Meredith S Irwin, Hiroyuki Shimada and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Revista de neurologia · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect ofJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Prognostic factors of neuroblastoma in limited-resource settings.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kevin CampbellDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie M Gastier-FosterInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Meegan MannInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Arlene H NaranjoChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Collin Van RynChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Rochelle BagatellDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Katherine K MatthayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California at San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Wendy B LondonDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-6538
Meredith S IrwinDepartment of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hiroyuki ShimadaDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-7792
M Meaghan GrangerDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cook Children's Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas.
Michael D HogartyDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Julie R ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Steven G DuBoisDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-738X

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Support for Human Specimen Banking in NCI-Supported Cancer Clinical TrialsU24CA114766 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI RAMIREZ MILAN, NILSA DEL CARMEN · 2005 to 2014
$14.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-level MYCN amplification (MNA) is associated with poor outcome and unfavorable clinical and biological features in patients with neuroblastoma. To the authors' knowledge, less is known regarding these associations in patients with low-level MYCN copy number increases.

methodsIn this retrospective study, the authors classified patients has having tumors with MYCN wild-type tumors, MYCN gain (2-4-fold increase in MYCN signal compared with the reference probe), or MNA (>4-fold increase). Tests of trend were used to investigate ordered associations between MYCN copy number category and features of interest. Log-rank tests and Cox models compared event-free survival and overall survival by subgroup.

resultsAmong 4672 patients, 3694 (79.1%) had MYCN wild-type tumors, 133 (2.8%) had MYCN gain, and 845 (18.1%) had MNA. For each clinical/biological feature, the percentage of patients with an unfavorable feature was lowest in the MYCN wild-type category, intermediate in the MYCN gain category, and highest in the MNA category (P<.0001), except for 11q aberration, for which the highest rates were in the MYCN gain category. Patients with MYCN gain had inferior event-free survival and overall survival compared with those with MYCN wild-type. Among patients with high-risk disease, MYCN gain was associated with the lowest response rate after chemotherapy. Patients with non-stage 4 disease (according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System) and patients with non-high-risk disease with MYCN gain had a significantly increased risk for death, a finding confirmed on multivariable testing.

conclusionsIncreasing MYCN copy number is associated with an increasingly higher rate of unfavorable clinical/biological features, with 11q aberration being an exception. Patients with MYCN gain appear to have inferior outcomes, especially in otherwise more favorable groups. Cancer 2017;123:4224-4235. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGene DosageChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGanglioneuromaHumansInfantLinear ModelsMaleNeoplasm StagingNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinamplificationgainMYCNneuroblastomaploidyprognosissegmental chromosomal aberration

Identifiers

PMID28696504
PMCPMC5650521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.