Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28696284›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Caffeine induces gastric acid secretion via bitter taste signaling in gastric parietal cells.

Kathrin Ingrid Liszt, Jakob Peter Ley, Barbara Lieder, Maik Behrens, Verena Stöger, Angelika Reiner, Christina Maria Hochkogler, Elke Köck, Alessandro Marchiori, Joachim Hans and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin Ingrid LisztDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Jakob Peter LeyResearch & Technology Flavors Division, Symrise AG, 37603 Holzminden, Germany.
Barbara LiederDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Maik BehrensDepartment of Molecular Genetics, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany.
Verena StögerChristian Doppler Laboratory for Bioactive Compounds, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Angelika ReinerPathologisch-Bakteriologisches Institut, Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Ost-Donauspital, 1220 Vienna, Austria.
Christina Maria HochkoglerChristian Doppler Laboratory for Bioactive Compounds, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Elke KöckDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Alessandro MarchioriDepartment of Molecular Genetics, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany.
Joachim HansResearch & Technology Flavors Division, Symrise AG, 37603 Holzminden, Germany.
Sabine WidderResearch & Technology Flavors Division, Symrise AG, 37603 Holzminden, Germany.
Gerhard KrammerResearch & Technology Flavors Division, Symrise AG, 37603 Holzminden, Germany.
Gareth John SangerBlizzard Institute, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
Mark Manuel SomozaInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Wolfgang MeyerhofDepartment of Molecular Genetics, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany.
Veronika SomozaDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria; veronika.somoza@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-9245
University of Vienna · ATSymrise (Germany) · DEGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEChristian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · ATDonauspital · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine, generally known as a stimulant of gastric acid secretion (GAS), is a bitter-tasting compound that activates several taste type 2 bitter receptors (TAS2Rs). TAS2Rs are expressed in the mouth and in several extraoral sites, e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract, in which their functional role still needs to be clarified. We hypothesized that caffeine evokes effects on GAS by activation of oral and gastric TAS2Rs and demonstrate that caffeine, when administered encapsulated, stimulates GAS, whereas oral administration of a caffeine solution delays GAS in healthy human subjects. Correlation analysis of data obtained from ingestion of the caffeine solution revealed an association between the magnitude of the GAS response and the perceived bitterness, suggesting a functional role of oral TAS2Rs in GAS. Expression of TAS2Rs, including cognate TAS2Rs for caffeine, was shown in human gastric epithelial cells of the corpus/fundus and in HGT-1 cells, a model for the study of GAS. In HGT-1 cells, various bitter compounds as well as caffeine stimulated proton secretion, whereby the caffeine-evoked effect was (

Indexed as

CaffeineFlavonesGastric AcidHumansParietal Cells, GastricReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTasteCaffeineFlavoneshomoeriodictyolReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledbitter taste receptorscaffeinegastric acid secretionhomoeriodictyolTAS2Rs

Identifiers

PMID28696284
PMCPMC5544304
OpenAlexW2734977949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.