Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28696016›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2018

Central nervous system relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma.

Brian De, Michael D Kinnaman, Leonard H Wexler, Kim Kramer, Suzanne L Wolden

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain metastases of sarcoma: a rare phenomenon in rare tumours.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Phase 1 study of intraventricularJournal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. B7-H3-targeted Radioimmunotherapy of Human Cancer.Current medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian DeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-3359
Michael D KinnamanDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Leonard H WexlerDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kim KramerDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Suzanne L WoldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal management of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is unclear. We examined diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with RMS developing CNS relapse.

methodsRecords of 23 patients diagnosed with CNS relapse between 1999 and 2016 were reviewed. Median age at presentation of CNS relapse was 15 years (range, 1-34 years). High-risk features at initial presentation were as follows: 16 alveolar patients, 13 Stage IV, and 13 with primary tumor in parameningeal locations.

resultsCNS relapse occurred at a median 12 months (range, 1-23 months) from diagnosis and most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 9), nausea/vomiting (n = 8), visual difficulty (n = 5), and none (n = 5). Leptomeningeal metastases were detected in 21 patients while only 2 developed parenchymal metastases without leptomeningeal involvement. Fifteen patients received CNS-directed radiation therapy (RT), including craniospinal irradiation to a median 36 Gy (range, 18-36 Gy) and/or whole brain radiotherapy to a median 30 Gy (range, 6-41.4 Gy). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 13 patients after RT initiation with 8 demonstrating improvement, 2 with stable disease, and 3 with progression. Twelve patients were tested for reactivity to I-131-labeled monoclonal antibody 8H9, and three tested positive and received at least one intra-Ommaya dose; all three lived >12 months post-CNS relapse. Twenty‐two patients died of CNS disease and one of treatment complications, with metastatic disease at other sites. Median survival post-CNS relapse was 5 months (range, 0.1-49 months).

conclusionsThe prognosis for patients with RMS developing CNS relapse remains poor. Treatment including CNS-directed RT should be considered and investigation into preventative therapies is warranted.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsRhabdomyosarcomaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCNS relapseimmunotherapyradiation therapyrhabdomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID28696016
PMCPMC7343338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.