Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28695407›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Nuclear cardiology in China: 2017.

Gongshun Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gongshun TangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxuexiang Street, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China. tgs010@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides the current state of nuclear cardiology in China and contrasts it with the state of nuclear cardiology in the United States (US). The West China Hospital and New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYPH) were used as representative hospitals to contrast nuclear cardiology in China and the US, respectively. In 2015, there were 101 medical cyclotrons, 774 SPECT or SPECT/CT, 240 PET/CT, and 6 PET/MR cameras in China. Most (~90%) of the nuclear cardiology studies are gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and ~10% are other types of studies including MUGA, PET/CT MPI, and viability studies. There are differences in nuclear cardiology between the West China Hospital and NYPH and these include those in cardiac stress tests, SPECT/CT acquisition protocols, PET/CT blood flow and viability studies, reimbursement, and fellowship training. In this paper, we aim to present status of nuclear cardiology in China and provide potential solutions.

Indexed as

Exercise TestCardiologyChinaHeartHumansMyocardial Perfusion ImagingNuclear MedicinePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadioisotopesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadioisotopesMPInuclear cardiac imagingPETSPECT

Identifiers

PMID28695407
PMCPMC5629245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.