Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694990›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Feasibility of a randomized single-blind crossover trial to assess the effects of the second-generation slow-release dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole on cued recall memory in idiopathic mild or moderate Parkinson's disease without cognitive impairment.

Thomas A Shepherd, Nicola M J Edelstyn, Laura Longshaw, Julius Sim, Keira Watts, Andrew R Mayes, Michael Murray, Simon J Ellis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas A ShepherdResearch Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, ST5 5BG Keele, Staffordshire UK.
Nicola M J EdelstynSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire UK.
Laura LongshawUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire UK.
Julius SimResearch Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, ST5 5BG Keele, Staffordshire UK.
Keira WattsUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire UK.
Andrew R MayesPsychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael MurraySchool of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire UK.
Simon J EllisUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire UK.
Keele University · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0211-24101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to assess the feasibility of a single-centre, single-blind, randomized, crossover design to explore the effects of two slow-release dopamine agonists, ropinirole and pramipexole, on cued recall in Parkinson's disease. As the design required a switch from the prescribed agonist (pramipexole-to-ropinirole, or ropinirole-to-pramipexole), the primary objectives were to (a) examine the efficacy of processes and procedures used to manage symptoms during the washout period and (b) to use cued recall estimates to inform a power calculation for a definitive trial. Secondary objectives were to assess consent and missing data rates, acceptability of clinical support for the OFF sessions, experience of the OFF sessions and of agonist switching, barriers-to-participation for patients and informal caregivers.

methodsPatients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two treatment arms and stabilized on each agonist for 6 weeks. The arms differed only in the sequence in which the agonists were administered. Cued recall was assessed ON medication and, following a washout period resulting in 93.75% agonist elimination, OFF medication.

resultsA total of 220 patients were screened: 145 were excluded and 75 invitations to participate were sent to eligible patients. Fifty-three patients declined, 22 consented and 16 completed the study. There were no serious adverse events, and rates of non-serious adverse events were equivalent between the agonists. Using the largest standard deviation (SD) of the ON-OFF difference cued recall score (inflated by ~25% to give a conservative estimate of the SD in a definitive trial) and assuming an effect of at least 10% of the observed range of OFF medication cued recall scores for either agonist to be clinically important, a main trial requires a sample size of just under 150 patients. The consent and missing data rates were 29 and 27% respectively. The washout period and the preparation for the OFF sessions were acceptable, and the sessions were manageable. The experience of switching was also manageable. Barriers to participation included concerns about disease stability, side effects, research process, carer workload and accessibility of the information sheet.

conclusionsThis study presented challenges to recruitment both in design and execution, and while it was a major aim of the study to assess this, evaluation of these challenges provided the opportunity to explore how they could be overcome for future studies.

trial registrationEudraCT 2012-000801-64.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityBarriers to participationCrossoverCued recallFeasibility studyIdiopathic Parkinson’s diseaseMedication withdrawalPramipexole PRRopinirole MRSafety processes

Identifiers

PMID28694990
PMCPMC5501424
OpenAlexW2726992133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.