Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694964›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2017

The impact of methicillin-resistant

A Elizabeth S Andreassen, Caroline M Jacobsen, BirgitteFreiesleben de Blasio, Richard White, Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, Petter Elstrøm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Healthcare-associated pneumonia: a prospective study in Spain.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Reply to Hemmige and David.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Targeting TB or MRSA in Norwegian municipalities during 'the refugee crisis' of 2015: a framework for priority setting in screening.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Burden of Untreated HCV Infection in Hospitalized Inmates: a Hospital Utilization and Cost Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Elizabeth S AndreassenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Marcus Thranesgate 2, 0473 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-5461
Caroline M JacobsenInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway, Forskningsveien 3A, 0373 Oslo, Norway.
BirgitteFreiesleben de BlasioNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Marcus Thranesgate 2, 0473 Oslo, Norway.
Richard WhiteNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Marcus Thranesgate 2, 0473 Oslo, Norway.
Ivar Sønbø KristiansenInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway, Forskningsveien 3A, 0373 Oslo, Norway.
Petter ElstrømNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Marcus Thranesgate 2, 0473 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with methicillin-resistant

methodsAnalyses were based on data fromSouth-Eastern Norway for the year 2012 as registered in the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases and the Norwegian Patient Registry. We used a matched case-control method to compare MRSA diagnosed inpatients with non-MRSA inpatients in terms of length of stay, readmissions within 30 days from discharge, as well as the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) based costs.

resultsNorwegian patients with MRSA stayed on average 8 days longer in hospital than controls, corresponding to a ratio of mean duration of 2.08 (CI 95%, 1.75-2.47) times longer.A total of 14% of MRSA positive inpatients were readmitted compared to 10% among controls. However, the risk of readmission was not significantly higher for patients with MRSA. DRG based hospital costs were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.19-0.54) times higher among cases than controls, with a mean cost of EUR13,233(SD 26,899) and EUR7198(SD 18,159) respectively.

conclusionThe results of this study indicate that Norwegian patients with MRSA have longer hospital stays, and higher costs than those without MRSA.

Indexed as

CostsDiagnosis-related groupInpatientLength of stayMethicillin-resistant S. aureusReadmission

Identifiers

PMID28694964
PMCPMC5501579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.