ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
Tri-layered composite plug for the repair of osteochondral defects: in vivo study in sheep.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogels for Osteochondral Interface Regeneration: Biomaterial Types, Processes, and Animal Models.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Investigation of the effects of Si-A/PUE@HA hydrogels on the osteochondral defect microenvironment based on single-cell RNA sequencing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Osteochondral tissue engineering‑based subchondral bone plate repair (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- In Vitro Investigation of 3D Printed Hydrogel Scaffolds with Electrospun Tidemark Component for Modeling Osteochondral Interface.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Tissue engineering strategies hold promise for the repair of articular cartilage injury.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Osteochondral tissue engineering in translational practice: histological assessments and scoring systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects with a 3DP-anchored three-phase complex.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Investigation into the effect of epidermal growth factor and hyaluronic acid on fracture healing in a rat femoral fracture model.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2023Article
- Multiphasic scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: Outcomes of preclinical studies.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Bio-inspired zonal-structured matrices for bone-cartilage interface engineering.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- Characterization of Properties, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate/Amino Acid Cements for Treatment of Osteochondral Defects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Animal Models of Osteochondral Defect for Testing Biomaterials.Biochemistry research international · 2020Review
- Differential chondro- and osteo-stimulation in three-dimensional porous scaffolds with different topological surfaces provides a design strategy for biphasic osteochondral engineering.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
- Peripheral mechanisms of arthritic pain: A proposal to leverage large animals forNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Review
- Efficacy of collagen and alginate hydrogels for the prevention of rat chondrocyte dedifferentiation.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cartilage defects are a source of pain, immobility, and reduced quality of life for patients who have acquired these defects through injury, wear, or disease. The avascular nature of cartilage tissue adds to the complexity of cartilage tissue repair or regeneration efforts. The known limitations of using autografts, allografts, or xenografts further add to this complexity. Autologous chondrocyte implantation or matrix-assisted chondrocyte implantation techniques attempt to introduce cultured cartilage cells to defect areas in the patient, but clinical success with these are impeded by the avascularity of cartilage tissue. Biodegradable, synthetic scaffolds capable of supporting local cells and overcoming the issue of poor vascularization would bypass the issues of current cartilage treatment options. In this study, we propose a biodegradable, tri-layered (poly(glycolic acid) mesh/poly(l-lactic acid)-colorant tidemark layer/collagen Type I and ceramic microparticle-coated poly(l-lactic acid)-poly(ϵ-caprolactone) monolith) osteochondral plug indicated for the repair of cartilage defects. The porous plug allows the continual transport of bone marrow constituents from the subchondral layer to the cartilage defect site for a more effective repair of the area. Assessment of the in vivo performance of the implant was conducted in an ovine model (n = 13). In addition to a control group (no implant), one group received the implant alone (Group A), while another group was supplemented with hyaluronic acid (0.8 mL at 10 mg/mL solution; Group B). Analyses performed on specimens from the in vivo study revealed that the implant achieves cartilage formation within 6 months. No adverse tissue reactions or other complications were reported. Our findings indicate that the porous biocompatible implant seems to be a promising treatment option for the cartilage repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.