Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694848›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2017

epiACO - a method for identifying epistasis based on ant Colony optimization algorithm.

Yingxia Sun, Junliang Shang, Jin-Xing Liu, Shengjun Li, Chun-Hou Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Secure High-Order Gene Interaction Detecting Method for Infectious Diseases.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingxia SunSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826 China.
Junliang ShangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826 China.
Jin-Xing LiuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826 China.
Shengjun LiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826 China.
Chun-Hou ZhengSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying epistasis or epistatic interactions, which refer to nonlinear interaction effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), is essential to understand disease susceptibility and to detect genetic architectures underlying complex diseases. Though many works have been done for identifying epistatic interactions, due to their methodological and computational challenges, the algorithmic development is still ongoing.

resultsIn this study, a method epiACO is proposed to identify epistatic interactions, which based on ant colony optimization algorithm. Highlights of epiACO are the introduced fitness function

conclusionsExperiments of epiACO and its comparison with other recent methods epiMODE, TEAM, BOOST, SNPRuler, AntEpiSeeker, AntMiner, MACOED, and IACO are performed on both simulation data sets and a real data set of age-related macular degeneration. Results show that epiACO is promising in identifying epistasis and might be an alternative to existing methods.

Indexed as

Ant colony optimizationBayesian networkEpistatic interactionsMutual information

Identifiers

PMID28694848
PMCPMC5500974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.