Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694705›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2017

Management of malignant pleural effusion: challenges and solutions.

Erika Penz, Kristina N Watt, Christopher A Hergott, Najib M Rahman, Ioannis Psallidas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06959173 (Organoid-guided Personalized Treatment of Pleural Effusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06959173 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Organoid-guided Personalized Treatment of Pleural Effusion

TypeobservationalSponsorHenan Cancer HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsLung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A patient-centred approach to malignant pleural effusion.European clinical respiratory journal · 2025
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erika PenzDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
Kristina N WattDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
Christopher A HergottDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Najib M RahmanOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Ioannis PsallidasOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
University of Saskatchewan · CAOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism · GBUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-RP-14-A17178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a sign of advanced cancer and is associated with significant symptom burden and mortality. To date, management has been palliative in nature with a focus on draining the pleural space, with therapies aimed at preventing recurrence or providing intermittent drainage through indwelling catheters. Given that patients with MPEs are heterogeneous with respect to their cancer type and response to systemic therapy, functional status, and pleural milieu, response to MPE therapy is also heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Furthermore, the impact of therapies on important patient outcomes has only recently been evaluated consistently in clinical trials and cohort studies. In this review, we examine patient outcomes that have been studied to date, address the question of which are most important for managing patients, and review the literature related to the expected value for money (cost-effectiveness) of indwelling pleural catheters relative to traditionally recommended approaches.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessmalignant pleural effusionquality of lifetherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID28694705
PMCPMC5491570
OpenAlexW2636581712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.