Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694687›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2017

Efficacy and safety of retinol palmitate ophthalmic solution in the treatment of dry eye: a Japanese Phase II clinical trial.

Hiroshi Toshida, Toshinari Funaki, Koichi Ono, Nobuhito Tabuchi, Sota Watanabe, Tamotsu Seki, Hiroshi Otake, Takuji Kato, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Akira Murakami

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi ToshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Toshinari FunakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine.
Koichi OnoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo.
Nobuhito TabuchiPharmaceutical Research Laboratories, Lion Corporation, Kanagawa.
Sota WatanabePharmaceutical Research Laboratories, Lion Corporation, Kanagawa.
Tamotsu SekiTamagawa Eye Clinic, Tokyo.
Hiroshi OtakeOtake Eye Clinic, Kanagawa.
Takuji KatoKato Eye Clinic, Tokyo.
Nobuyuki EbiharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Akira MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine.
Juntendo University · JPLion Corporation (Japan) · JPMinamiaoyama Eye Clinic · JPJuntendo University Shizuoka Hospital · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPMiyake Eye Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the administration of retinol palmitate (VApal) ophthalmic solution (500 IU/mL) for the treatment of patients with dry eye. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study included 66 patients with dry eye. After a 2-week washout period, patients were randomized (1:1) into either a VApal ophthalmic solution or a placebo group, and a single drop of either solution was administered six times daily for 4 weeks. Efficacy measures were 12 subjective symptoms, rose bengal (RB) and fluorescein staining scores, tear film breakup time, and tear secretion. Safety measures included clinical blood and urine analyses and adverse event recordings.

resultsIn comparisons of the two groups, the mean change in RB staining score from baseline was significantly lower in the VApal group at 2 and 4 weeks (

conclusionVApal ophthalmic solution (500 IU/mL) is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with dry eye.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntioxidantsDiterpenesDouble-Blind MethodDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsRetinyl EstersTearsTreatment OutcomeAntioxidantsDiterpenesOphthalmic Solutionsretinol palmitateRetinyl EstersVitamin Aconjunctivacorneamucintearvitamin A

Identifiers

PMID28694687
PMCPMC5491700
OpenAlexW2696855049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.