Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694613›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Cognitive and Functional Outcomes following Inpatient Rehabilitation in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury: A Prospective Follow-up Study.

Maitreyi Patil, Anupam Gupta, Meeka Khanna, Arun B Taly, Amit Soni, J Keshav Kumar, K Thennarasu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of mobility measures among individuals with acquired brain injury: an umbrella review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maitreyi PatilDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Anupam GuptaDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Meeka KhannaDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Arun B TalyDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Amit SoniDepartment of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Keshav KumarDepartment of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
K ThennarasuDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study the effects of cognitive retraining and inpatient rehabilitation to study the effects of cognitive retraining and inpatient rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). DESIGN AND

settingThis was a prospective follow-up study in a neurological rehabilitation department of quaternary research hospital. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty patients with ABI, mean age 36.43 years (standard deviation [SD] 12.6, range 18-60), mean duration of illness 77.87 days (SD 91.78, range 21-300 days) with cognitive, physical, and motor-sensory deficits underwent inpatient rehabilitation for minimum of 14 sessions over a period of 3 weeks. Nineteen patients (63%) reported in the follow-up of minimum 3 months after discharge. Type of ABI, cognitive status (using Montreal Cognitive assessment scale [MoCA] and cognitive Functional Independence Measure [Cog FIM]

resultsPatients received inpatient rehabilitation addressing cognitive and functional impairments. Baseline MoCA, motor FIM, and Cog FIM scores were 15.27 (SD = 7.2, range 3-30), 31.57 (SD = 15.6, range 12-63), and 23.47 (SD = 9.7, range 5-35), respectively. All the parameters improved significantly at the time of discharge (MoCA = 19.6 ± 7.4 range 3-30, motor FIM

conclusionsCognitive and functional outcomes improve significantly with dedicated and specialized inpatient rehabilitation in ABI patients, which is sustainable over a period.

Indexed as

Acquired brain injurycognitive retrainingfollow-upfunctional recoveryinpatient rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28694613
PMCPMC5488554
OpenAlexW2625511404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.