Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Non-invasive imaging of engineered human tumors in the living chicken embryo.

Benedict Jefferies, Florian Lenze, Anuja Sathe, Nguyen Truong, Martina Anton, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Roman Nawroth, Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological Sample Collection to Advance Research and Treatment: A Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research and Euro Ewing Consortium Statement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedict JefferiesDepartment of Orthopedics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian LenzeDepartment of Orthopedics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anuja SatheDepartment of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nguyen TruongDepartment of Orthopedics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martina AntonDepartments of Molecular Immunology and Experimental Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-RotheDepartment of Orthopedics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Roman NawrothDepartment of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. roman.nawroth@tum.de.
Philipp Mayer-KuckukDepartment of Orthopedics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. mayerkup@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing interest in engineered tumor models prompted us to devise a method for the non-invasive assessment of such models. Here, we report on bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the assessment of engineered tumor models in the fertilized chicken egg, i.e, chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. One prostate cancer (PC-3) and two osteosarcoma (MG63 and HOS) cell lines were modified with luciferase reporter genes. To create engineered tumors, these cell lines were seeded either onto basement membrane extract (BME) or gelfoam scaffolds, and subsequently grafted in vivo onto the CAM. BLI enabled non-invasive, specific detection of the engineered tumors on the CAM in the living chicken embryo. Further, BLI permitted daily, quantitative monitoring of the engineered tumors over the course of up to 7 days. Data showed that an extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of BME supported growth of reporter gene marked PC-3 tumors but did not support MG63 or HOS tumor growth. However, MG63 tumors engineered on the collagen-based gelfoam ECM showed a temporal proliferation burst in MG63 tumors. Together, the data demonstrated imaging of engineered human cancer models in living chicken embryos. The combination of CAM assay and BLI holds significant potential for the examination of a broad range of engineered tumor models.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneExtracellular MatrixHumansLuciferasesLuminescent MeasurementsMaleModels, BiologicalNeoplasm TransplantationOsteosarcomaProstatic NeoplasmsTissue ScaffoldsLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID28694510
PMCPMC5504052
OpenAlexW2733066753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.