Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Google Trends can improve surveillance of Type 2 diabetes.

Nataliya Tkachenko, Sarunkorn Chotvijit, Neha Gupta, Emma Bradley, Charlotte Gilks, Weisi Guo, Henry Crosby, Eliot Shore, Malkiat Thiarai, Rob Procter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Public interest in drug-related problems reflected in information search trends: an infodemiological study.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Poor Medication Adherence in African Americans Is a Matter of Trust.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nataliya TkachenkoWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Nataliya.Tkachenko@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-6708
Sarunkorn ChotvijitWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Neha GuptaWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Emma BradleyExperian, The Sir John Peace Building, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, NG80 1ZZ, UK.
Charlotte GilksExperian, The Sir John Peace Building, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, NG80 1ZZ, UK.
Weisi GuoWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-3953
Henry CrosbyWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Eliot ShoreWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-2374
Malkiat ThiaraiWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Rob ProcterWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Stephen JarvisWarwick Institute for the Science of Cities, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrate that people are increasingly looking online to assess their health, with reasons varying from personal preferences and beliefs to inability to book a timely appointment with their local medical practice. Records of these activities represent a new source of data about the health of populations, but which is currently unaccounted for by disease surveillance models. This could potentially be useful as evidence of individuals' perception of bodily changes and self-diagnosis of early symptoms of an emerging disease. We make use of the Experian geodemographic Mosaic dataset in order to extract Type 2 diabetes candidate risk variables and compare their temporal relationships with the search keywords, used to describe early symptoms of the disease on Google. Our results demonstrate that Google Trends can detect early signs of diabetes by monitoring combinations of keywords, associated with searches for hypertension treatment and poor living conditions; Combined search semantics, related to obesity, how to quit smoking and improve living conditions (deprivation) can be also employed, however, may lead to less accurate results.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Early DiagnosisHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetPopulation SurveillanceSearch Engine

Identifiers

PMID28694479
PMCPMC5504026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.