ArticleScientific reports2017
Comparison of Fecal Microbial Composition and Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Swine, Farm Workers and the Surrounding Villagers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- WORKbiota: A Systematic Review about the Effects of Occupational Exposure on Microbiota and Workers' Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of Long-Acting Ampicillin and Its Impact on the Gut Microbiome and Resistome in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Restaurant occupational exposure affects the profiles of oral and gut pathobiomes and resistomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The resistome bridge between livestock and workers: novel frameworks for early detection and monitoring of antimicrobial resistance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Animal farming and the oral microbiome in the Agricultural Health Study.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Alternatives to antibiotics for sustainable livestock production in the context of the One Health approach: tackling a common foe.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Article
- Farming Activities and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A French Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Article
- The Role of the Microbiome in Allergy, Asthma, and Occupational Lung Disease.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2024Review
- Ameliorative Effects of Korean-Red-Ginseng-Derived Polysaccharide on Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea.Polymers · 2024Article
- Effects of microbes in pig farms on occupational exposed persons and the environment.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Effects of Unconventional Work and Shift Work on the Human Gut Microbiota and the Potential of Probiotics to Restore Dysbiosis.Nutrients · 2023Review
- International Travel as a Risk Factor for Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Variation in Microbial Exposure at the Human-Animal Interface and the Implications for Microbiome-Mediated Health Outcome.mSystems · 2021Article
- Changes in antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli during the broiler feeding cycle.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Comparative assessment of faecal microbial composition and metabonome of swine, farmers and human control.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Antibiotic resistomes of healthy pig faecal metagenomes.Microbial genomics · 2019Article
- The dynamics of the antibiotic resistome in the feces of freshly weaned pigs following therapeutic administration of oxytetracycline.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Gene Transmission in the One Health Microbiosphere and the Channels of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Deciphering Resistome and Virulome Diversity in a Porcine Slaughterhouse and Pork Products Through Its Production Chain.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The external environment plays a critical role in shaping the structure of the gut microbiome. One potential health threat lies in the release of antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) from cross-contaminated microbiomes. We focused this study on a comparison of fecal microbial composition and antibiotic resistant genes between farm workers, local villagers and swine. We used a high-throughput next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA and real-time PCR for these studies. Our results indicated that workers had less species diversity as compared to the local villagers. Moreover, the bacterial communities of the farm workers, the local villagers and swine feces were clearly divided into three groups. The workers had a greater abundance of Proteobacteria as compared to swine and the local villagers. The Clostridiaceae in the workers and swine were more abundant than the local villagers. In addition, there were ARG differences between the farm workers or local villager's and swine feces. The farm workers and the local villagers had similar relative abundance except for macrolide ARGs. Taken together, these data suggest that the swine farm environment affects the fecal bacterial composition of swine farm workers. However, ARG spread was influenced by factors independent of the swine farm environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.