Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694389›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of endocrinology2017

Are lower TSH cutoffs in neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism warranted?

Samantha Lain, Caroline Trumpff, Scott D Grosse, Antonella Olivieri, Guy Van Vliet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of endocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Incidence of Congenital Hypothyroidism Is Increasing in Chile.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Guidelines for Newborn Screening of Congenital Hypothyroidism (2021 Revision).Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Samantha LainMenzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Australia.
Caroline TrumpffDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Antonella OlivieriDepartment of Cardiovascular, Dysmetabolic and Ageing-associated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Roma, Italy.
Guy Van VlietEndocrinology Service and Research Center of the Sainte-Justine Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When newborn screening (NBS) for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) as a primary screening test was introduced, typical TSH screening cutoffs were 20-50 U/L of whole blood. Over the years, lowering of TSH cutoffs has contributed to an increased prevalence of detected CH. However, a consensus on the benefit deriving from lowering TSH cutoffs at screening is lacking. The present paper outlines arguments both for and against the lowering of TSH cutoffs at NBS. It includes a review of recently published evidence from Australia, Belgium and Italy. A section focused on economic implications of lowering TSH cutoffs is also provided. One issue that bears further examination is the extent to which mild iodine deficiency at the population level might affect the association of neonatal TSH values with cognitive and developmental outcomes. A debate on TSH cutoffs provides the opportunity to reflect on how to make NBS for CH more effective and to guarantee optimum neurocognitive development and a good quality of life to babies with mild as well as with severe CH. All authors of this debate article agree on the need to establish optimal TSH cutoffs for screening programs in various settings and to ensure the benefits of screening and access to care for newborns worldwide.

Indexed as

Congenital HypothyroidismEuropeHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicThyrotropinThyrotropincongenital hypothyroidismcutoffnewborn screeningTSH

Identifiers

PMID28694389
PMCPMC5763485
OpenAlexW2735883109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.