Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694338›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance.

Joseph W Kable, M Kathleen Caulfield, Mary Falcone, Mairead McConnell, Leah Bernardo, Trishala Parthasarathi, Nicole Cooper, Rebecca Ashare, Janet Audrain-McGovern, Robert Hornik and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph W KableDepartments of Psychology and kable@psych.upenn.edu.
M Kathleen CaulfieldDepartments of Psychology and.
Mary FalconePsychiatry, and.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-2438
Mairead McConnellDepartments of Psychology and.
Leah BernardoPsychiatry, and.
Trishala ParthasarathiDepartments of Psychology and.
Nicole CooperDepartments of Psychology and.
Rebecca AsharePsychiatry, and.
Janet Audrain-McGovernPsychiatry, and.
Robert HornikAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2148-8805
Paul DiefenbachDepartment of Digital Media, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-6897-5096
Frank J LeeDepartment of Digital Media, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Caryn LermanPsychiatry, and.
Drexel University · USKabul University · AFUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Neuroscience-based Interventions for Cancer Risk Behavior ChangeR35CA197461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LERMAN, CARYN · 2015 to 2021
$6.0M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN BEHAVIORAL/COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH017168 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KABLE, JOSEPH W · 1985 to 2018
$4.2M
Retraining Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Cancer Risk Behavior (PQ4)R01CA170297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KABLE, JOSEPH W, LERMAN, CARYN · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170297NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197461NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH017168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased preference for immediate over delayed rewards and for risky over certain rewards has been associated with unhealthy behavioral choices. Motivated by evidence that enhanced cognitive control can shift choice behavior away from immediate and risky rewards, we tested whether training executive cognitive function could influence choice behavior and brain responses. In this randomized controlled trial, 128 young adults (71 male, 57 female) participated in 10 weeks of training with either a commercial web-based cognitive training program or web-based video games that do not specifically target executive function or adapt the level of difficulty throughout training. Pretraining and post-training, participants completed cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging during performance of the following validated decision-making tasks: delay discounting (choices between smaller rewards now vs larger rewards in the future) and risk sensitivity (choices between larger riskier rewards vs smaller certain rewards). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no evidence that cognitive training influences neural activity during decision-making; nor did we find effects of cognitive training on measures of delay discounting or risk sensitivity. Participants in the commercial training condition improved with practice on the specific tasks they performed during training, but participants in both conditions showed similar improvement on standardized cognitive measures over time. Moreover, the degree of improvement was comparable to that observed in individuals who were reassessed without any training whatsoever. Commercial adaptive cognitive training appears to have no benefits in healthy young adults above those of standard video games for measures of brain activity, choice behavior, or cognitive performance.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyRewardAdultBrainChoice BehaviorCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansLearningMaleTask Performance and Analysiscognitive trainingdelay discountingimpulsivityneuroimagingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID28694338
PMCPMC5546110
OpenAlexW2736288670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.