Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694336›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.

Rebecca E Millman, Sven L Mattys, André D Gouws, Garreth Prendergast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Parallel Age-Related Cochlear Neural Degeneration and Cortical Gain Adaptation in Normal-Hearing Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cortical Responses to the Amplitude Envelopes of Sounds Change with Age.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca E MillmanManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Division of Human Communication, Deafness and Hearing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom, rebecca.millman@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-0167
Sven L MattysDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-585X
André D GouwsYork Neuroimaging Centre, The Biocentre, York Science Park, Heslington, York YO10 5NY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-7829
Garreth PrendergastManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Division of Human Communication, Deafness and Hearing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verbal communication in noisy backgrounds is challenging. Understanding speech in background noise that fluctuates in intensity over time is particularly difficult for hearing-impaired listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The reduction in fast-acting cochlear compression associated with SNHL exaggerates the perceived fluctuations in intensity in amplitude-modulated sounds. SNHL-induced changes in the coding of amplitude-modulated sounds may have a detrimental effect on the ability of SNHL listeners to understand speech in the presence of modulated background noise. To date, direct evidence for a link between magnified envelope coding and deficits in speech identification in modulated noise has been absent. Here, magnetoencephalography was used to quantify the effects of SNHL on phase locking to the temporal envelope of modulated noise (envelope coding) in human auditory cortex. Our results show that SNHL enhances the amplitude of envelope coding in posteromedial auditory cortex, whereas it enhances the fidelity of envelope coding in posteromedial and posterolateral auditory cortex. This dissociation was more evident in the right hemisphere, demonstrating functional lateralization in enhanced envelope coding in SNHL listeners. However, enhanced envelope coding was not perceptually beneficial. Our results also show that both hearing thresholds and, to a lesser extent, magnified cortical envelope coding in left posteromedial auditory cortex predict speech identification in modulated background noise. We propose a framework in which magnified envelope coding in posteromedial auditory cortex disrupts the segregation of speech from background noise, leading to deficits in speech perception in modulated background noise.

Indexed as

NoiseAcoustic StimulationAgedAudiometry, SpeechAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleForecastingHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual MaskingSpeech Perceptionenvelope codingmagnetoencephalographysensorineural hearing lossspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID28694336
PMCPMC5551064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.