Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28694096›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2017

A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici.

Helen N Fones, Chris J Eyles, William Kay, Josh Cowper, Sarah J Gurr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Drought on Cereals Infected withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effect of Different Light Wavelengths onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Blocked at the Stomatal Gate, a Key Step of WheatFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen N FonesGeoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Chris J EylesGeoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
William KayGeoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Josh CowperGeoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Sarah J GurrGeoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK; Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; Donder's Hon Chair, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.j.gurr@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBJ008923/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24-48h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal infection conditions. Here, we explicitly assess the timing of entry, using GFP-tagged Z. tritici. We show that early entry is comparatively rare, and extended epiphytic growth possible. We test the hypotheses that our data diverge from earlier studies due to: i. random ingress of Z. tritici into the leaf, with some early entry events; ii. previous reliance upon fungal stains, combined with poor attachment of Z. tritici to the leaf, leading to increased likelihood of observing internal versus external growth, compared to using GFP; iii. use of exceptionally high humidity to promote entry in previous studies. We combine computer simulation of leaf-surface growth with thousands of in planta observations to demonstrate that while spores germinate rapidly on the leaf, over 95% of fungi remain epiphytic, growing randomly over the leaf for ten days or more. We show that epiphytic fungi are easily detached from leaves by rinsing and that humidity promotes epiphytic growth, increasing infection rates. Together, these results explain why epiphytic growth has been dismissed and early ingress assumed. The prolonged epiphytic phase should inform studies of pathogenicity and virulence mutants, disease control strategies, and interpretation of the observed low in planta growth, metabolic quiescence and evasion of plant defences by Zymoseptoria during symptomless infection.

Indexed as

HumidityAnalysis of VarianceAscomycotaBenzimidazolesCarbamatesFungicides, IndustrialPhosphitesPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesSpores, FungalTime FactorsTriticumBenzimidazolesCarbamatescarbendazimFungicides, IndustrialPhosphitesCrop pathogensEpiphytic growthFood securityHumidityMycosphaerella graminicolaSeptoria leaf blotchWheatZymoseptoria tritici

Identifiers

PMID28694096
PMCPMC5556705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.