Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693610›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2017

GATA3 is a sensitive marker for primary genital extramammary paget disease: an immunohistochemical study of 72 cases with comparison to gross cystic disease fluid protein 15.

Ming Zhao, Lixin Zhou, Li Sun, Yan Song, Yunquan Guo, Xun Zhang, Feng Zhao, Peng Wang, Junqiu Yue, Dongfeng Niu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Lixin ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Li SunDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Yan SongDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yunquan GuoDepartment of Pathology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Urumqi, China.
Xun ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Feng ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Urumqi, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junqiu YueDepartment of Pathology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Dongfeng NiuDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Zhongwu LiDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Xiaozheng HuangDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Qiang KangDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Lin JiaDepartment of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital), Beijing, China.
Jinping LaiDepartment of Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Dengfeng CaoDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8118, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. dcao@path.wustl.edu.
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNBeijing Ditan Hospital · CNHubei Cancer Hospital · CNSaint Louis University · USTumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNWashington University in St. Louis · USXinjiang Medical University · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) has been identified as a sensitive marker for breast carcinoma but its sensitivity in primary genital extramammary Paget diseases (EMPDs) has not been well studied.

methodsHere we investigated immunohistochemical expression of GATA3 in 72 primary genital EMPDs (35 from female, 37 from male; 45 with intraepithelial disease only, 26 with both intraepithelial disease and invasive adenocarcinoma including 14 also metastasis, 1 with metastatic adenocarcinoma only for study). We also compared GATA3 to gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) for their sensitivity.

resultsPositive GATA3 staining was seen in all 71 (100%) intraepithelial diseases, 25/26 (96%; female 10/10, male 15/16) invasive adenocarcinomas and 14/15 (93%; female 3/3, male 11/12) metastatic adenocarcinomas, respectively. Positive GCDFP15 staining was seen in 46/71 (65%; female 28/34 or 82%, male 18/37 or 49%) intraepithelial diseases, 20/26 (77%; female 9/10, male 11/16) invasive adenocarcinomas, and 12/15 (80%; female 2/3, male 10/12) metastatic adenocarcinomas, respectively (GATA3 versus GCDFP15: p < 0.01 for both intraepithelial disease and invasive adenocarcinoma, p = 0.28 for metastatic adenocarcinoma). In positive-stained cases, GATA3 stained more tumor cells than GCDFP15 (79% versus 25% for intraepithelial disease, 71% vs 34% for invasive adenocarcinoma, 73% vs 50% for metastatic adenocarcinoma, p < 0.01 for all 3 components).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that GATA3 is a very sensitive marker for primary genital EMPDs and is more sensitive than GCDFP15.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarrier ProteinsFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorGenital Diseases, FemaleGenital Diseases, MaleGlycoproteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsPaget Disease, ExtramammaryBiomarkers, TumorCarrier ProteinsGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorGlycoproteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsPIP protein, humanExtramammary Paget diseaseGATA3GCDFP15Immunohistochemical marker

Identifiers

PMID28693610
PMCPMC5504764
OpenAlexW2734320569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.