Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693580›Full record

ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2017

Telemedicine and other care models in pediatric rheumatology: an exploratory study of parents' perceptions of barriers to care and care preferences.

Danielle R Bullock, Richard K Vehe, Lei Zhang, Colleen K Correll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pediatric rheumatology education: the virtual frontier a review.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Future challenges in rheumatology - is telemedicine the solution?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle R BullockDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, East Bldg Rm M668, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. brue0190@umn.edu.
Richard K VeheDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, East Bldg Rm M668, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Lei ZhangClinical and Translational Sciences Institute, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
Colleen K CorrellDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, East Bldg Rm M668, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States pediatric rheumatology workforce is committed to a mission of providing children access to pediatric rheumatology care. With a limited number and distribution of pediatric rheumatologists, telemedicine has been proposed as one way to meet this mission, yet the adoption of this modality has been slower than expected. The purpose of this study was to explore the parent perspective on barriers to accessing pediatric rheumatology care and to explore the acceptability of telemedicine and other alternative care models.

methodsOver a period of six weeks, all new and return English-speaking parents/guardians of patients visiting a single center were offered an opportunity to complete a survey which assessed barriers to care and interest in alternative models of care. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsSurvey response rate was 72% (159/221). Twenty-eight percent (45/159) traveled more than three hours to the pediatric rheumatology clinic, and 43% (65/152) reported travel as inconvenient. An overwhelming majority of respondents (95%, 144/152) reported a preference for in-person visits over the option of telemedicine. This preference was similar regardless of whether respondents reported travel to the clinic as inconvenient vs convenient (inconvenient 92%, 60/65; convenient 97%, 84/87; p = 0.2881) and despite those reporting travel as inconvenient also reporting greater difficulty with several barriers to care. Those familiar with telemedicine were more likely to report a preference for telemedicine over in-person visits (27%, 3/11 vs 3%, 4/140; p = 0.0087). The option of an outreach clinic was acceptable to a majority (63%, 97/154); however, adult rheumatology and shared-care options were less acceptable (22%, 35/156 and 34%, 53/156 respectively).

conclusionAmong survey respondents, in-person visits were preferred over the option of telemedicine, even when travel was noted to be inconvenient. Telemedicine familiarity increased its acceptability. Outreach clinics were acceptable to a majority. Ultimately, the parent perspective can shape acceptable ways to address barriers and provide accessible care.

Indexed as

PediatricsRheumatologyAdultChildCommunication BarriersFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleModels, OrganizationalParentsRheumatic DiseasesSocial PerceptionTelemedicineUnited StatesAccessBarriersOutreachPediatric rheumatologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID28693580
PMCPMC5504634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.