Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693524›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2017

National consensus on communication in prehospital trauma care, the DENIM study.

Annelieke Maria Karien Harmsen, Leo Maria George Geeraedts, Georgios Fredericus Giannakopoulos, Maartje Terra, Herman M T Christiaans, Lidwine Brigitta Mokkink, Frank Willem Bloemers

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prehospital critical care dispatch: a scoping review (PHASE).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Paramedic to trauma team verbal handover optimization - a complex interaction.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annelieke Maria Karien HarmsenDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.harmsen@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-4694
Leo Maria George GeeraedtsDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Georgios Fredericus GiannakopoulosDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje TerraDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Herman M T ChristiaansDepartment of Anaesthesiology VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lidwine Brigitta MokkinkDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank Willem BloemersDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands prehospital trauma care is provided by emergency medical services (EMS) nurses. This care is extended by Physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (P-HEMS) for the more severely injured patient. Prehospital communication is a factor of influence on the identification of these patients and the dispatch of P-HEMS. Though prehospital communication it is often perceived to be incomplete and unstructured. To elucidated factors of influence on prehospital triage and the identification of the severely injured patient a Delphi study was performed.

methodsA three round modified Delphi study was designed to explore concepts amongst experts in prehospital trauma care. P-HEMS physicians/nurses, trauma surgeons, EMS nurses and dispatch center operators where asked to state their opinion regarding identification of the poly trauma patient, trauma patient characteristics, prehospital communication and prehospital handover.

resultsSeventy-one panellist completed all three rounds. For the first round seven cases and 13 theses were presented. From the answers/argumentation the second round was build, in which 68 theses had to be ranked within four principle themes: factors that influence prehospital communication, critical information for proper handover, factors influencing collaboration and how training/education can influence this. Out of these answers the third survey was build, focussing on determining the exact content of a prehospital trauma handover. The majority of the panellists agreed to a set of parameters resulting in a new model of inter-professional hand over regarding prehospital trauma patients. DISCUSSION: Exact identification of the poly trauma patient in need of care by P-HEMS is difficult though prehospital communication and the prehospital handover may be improved.

conclusionThe respondents report that prehospital communication needs to be unambiguous to improve trauma care. Consensus was reached on a set of ten parameters that should minimally be handed over with regard to a prehospital trauma patient. This to facilitate prehospital communication between the Dispatch centre, EMS, P-HEMS and the receiving hospital.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Medical ServicesAir AmbulancesDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient HandoffTriage

Identifiers

PMID28693524
PMCPMC5504644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.