Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693493›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2017

Comparison of in-house and commercial real time-PCR based carbapenemase gene detection methods in Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting gram-negative bacterial isolates.

M Smiljanic, M Kaase, P Ahmad-Nejad, B Ghebremedhin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Detection of Beta-Lactamases Genes amongBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Screening for Carbapenemases in Ertapenem-ResistantEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Prevalence ofIranian journal of pathology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M SmiljanicCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Institute for Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, HELIOS University Clinic Wuppertal; Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
M KaaseDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
P Ahmad-NejadCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Institute for Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, HELIOS University Clinic Wuppertal; Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
B GhebremedhinCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Institute for Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, HELIOS University Clinic Wuppertal; Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. beniam.ghebremedhin@uni-wh.de.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria are increasing globally and have been associated with outbreaks in hospital settings. Thus, the accurate detection of these bacteria in infections is mandatory for administering the adequate therapy and infection control measures. This study aimed to establish and evaluate a multiplex real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of carbapenemase gene variants in gram-negative rods and to compare the performance with a commercial RT-PCR assay (Check-Direct CPE).

methods116 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were genotyped for carbapenemase genes by PCR and sequencing. The defined isolates were used for the validation of the in-house RT-PCR by use of designed primer pairs and probes.

resultsAmong the carbapenem-resistant isolates the genes bla

conclusionThe Check-Direct CPE and the in-house RT-PCR assay detected the carbapenem resistance from solid culture isolates. Moreover, the in-house assay enabled the identification of carbapenemase genes directly from positive blood-culture vials. However, we observed insufficient detection of various OXA genes in both assays. Nevertheless, the in-house RT-PCR detected the majority of the OXA type genes in Enterobacteriaceae and A. baumannii.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseAcinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenemasesMDR gram-negative bacteriaRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID28693493
PMCPMC5504714
OpenAlexW2735695336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.